Remuan said in forum #430150:
I'll add onto this that the filename looks like it was extracted from a game, if you took it from the game you can use the self-datamine tag so approvers have an idea of the source
Thanks,I got it
Posted under General
Remuan said in forum #430150:
I'll add onto this that the filename looks like it was extracted from a game, if you took it from the game you can use the self-datamine tag so approvers have an idea of the source
Thanks,I got it
(NSFW)
post #10898304
post #10638169
post #11022711
Messages: "Other posts are irrelevant"
At this point, I legitimately don't know what you write in the appeal reason box.
How do you make a case for meeting a quality standard when comparison is not allowed?
Is there really no precedent to point to when help:upload says to search status:active approver:any?
Is it wrong to point out that a user looking at a set of active posts would probably want to see the appealed post as well?
Should we even state when an appeal is for an obvious 1up?
Seems like the appeal reason box is just for pleading or when a post was looked at by 5 approvers.
Kuruma said in forum #425885:
Anatomy, long hands, body proportions
for a food gag? long hands/proportions didn't stop post #10873873 being approved
didsomeonejustsayweeaboo said in forum #430472:
for a food gag? long hands/proportions didn't stop post #10873873 being approved
Different image, different type of judgement
Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #430467:
At this point, I legitimately don't know what you write in the appeal reason box.
How do you make a case for meeting a quality standard when comparison is not allowed?
Is there really no precedent to point to when help:upload says to search status:active approver:any?
Is it wrong to point out that a user looking at a set of active posts would probably want to see the appealed post as well?
Should we even state when an appeal is for an obvious 1up?Seems like the appeal reason box is just for pleading or when a post was looked at by 5 approvers.
When I appeal a post just because I think it looks good enough, I usually just leave the reason blank. I occasionally see appeals from others that include subjective statements ("cute," "good art," etc.), whining/complaining, and other unneeded fluff. I highly doubt the Approvers find that useful and I'm sure they probably tune most of that out.
When I do write a reason for appeal, it's typically to point out things like it's a superior version of an approved post (which would in theory be likely to approved by the same Approver), the source field was fixed, or some other important thing they might have missed. Most of the time, though, I don't find it necessary to add anything since the strongest argument I have is that I think the post is good quality, which the Approvers already know by the fact that I appealed it.
Blank_User said in forum #430676:
When I appeal a post just because I think it looks good enough, I usually just leave the reason blank. I occasionally see appeals from others that include subjective statements ("cute," "good art," etc.), whining/complaining, and other unneeded fluff. I highly doubt the Approvers find that useful and I'm sure they probably tune most of that out.
When I do write a reason for appeal, it's typically to point out things like it's a superior version of an approved post (which would in theory be likely to approved by the same Approver), the source field was fixed, or some other important thing they might have missed. Most of the time, though, I don't find it necessary to add anything since the strongest argument I have is that I think the post is good quality, which the Approvers already know by the fact that I appealed it.
Yeah, I always try to write down the reasons why I appeal some posts
GolfFoxtrotLima said in forum #430763:
Yeah, I always try to write down the reasons why I appeal some posts
You only gave reasons for two of your appeals, and both of them have exactly the kind of content I suggested avoiding. How is "This should not be deleted," or "Its decent, its also high quality" useful to Approvers?
Hello, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #9418150
post #9775968
post #7360935
Updated by SidBarrett
(NSFW)
post #11066343
post #11066324
post #11066313
post #11066295
post #11066350
This is a different scene from the same game as the approved game cg.
(Approved game cg scenes)
post #11104397
post #11103748
post #11103734
post #11103731
post #11103720
When I do write a reason for appeal, it's typically to point out things like it's a superior version of an approved post (which would in theory be likely to approved by the same Approver), the source field was fixed, or some other important thing they might have missed. Most of the time, though, I don't find it necessary to add anything since the strongest argument I have is that I think the post is good quality, which the Approvers already know by the fact that I appealed it.
But "other posts are irrelevant," right?
Regardless.
If the goal is to get the same approver's attention, perhaps we should call them out by name in our appeals?
I'm curious as to which approvers have been the least consistent here
status:active parent:deleted approver:any
Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #431343:
But "other posts are irrelevant," right?
Yes, when they're completely different images. But if we're talking about an objectively superior version of an image that was already approved, such as having a higher (non-upscaled) resolution or fewer jpeg artifacts, then it should in theory also be approvable (at least by the one that approved the original).
Regardless.
If the goal is to get the same approver's attention, perhaps we should call them out by name in our appeals?
No. That would be a very bad idea, almost as bad as DMailing them directly. Getting the attention of specific Approvers should not be your goal.
Some Approvers comb through deleted posts. If your post is good, it is likely to be approved eventually. If your appeal fails, the best thing to do is wait.
all the dark skinned versions of this post are deleted (and after i said this last time someone flagged a light skinned variant too)
post #10787714
post #6296118
post #10813606
post #10813620
also will someone please for the love of god approve the last variant of a 30 variant set that is still deleted in spite of 29 variants that look literally the same having been approved?
post #10470439 - need eyes on this, it's an official Vocaloid image
Any idea why? post #10739793
post #11069281
post #11069190
post #11060565 (don't see the poor quality in this)
Can someone tell me what's wrong with these? All are pretty nicely drawn and in good quality, especially the Tails image
Blank_User said in forum #430879:
You only gave reasons for two of your appeals, and both of them have exactly the kind of content I suggested avoiding. How is "This should not be deleted," or "Its decent, its also high quality" useful to Approvers?
Yeah, I should be more specific about that
TheGamingRodent said in forum #431683:
post #11069281
post #11069190
post #11060565 (don't see the poor quality in this)Can someone tell me what's wrong with these? All are pretty nicely drawn and in good quality, especially the Tails image
2 of those posts should be approved, I’m not sure about that miles the Fox one
TheGamingRodent said in forum #429134:
post #11057881
post #11057874
post #11057866Don't see what's wrong with these, pretty nicely drawn and are in good quality
Yeah, these should be approved