A generic tag for sex between monster people

I need help brainstorming the name for a tag for significantly-monstrous people romancing/having sex with each other.

We currently have:

• lamia with lamia
• taur with taur
• mermaid with mermaid

We should have an umbrella tag for these, so that we can tag other cases without having a 20-tag dispersion and so that it can also apply to different kinds of monsters bumping uglies together, but it should have a name that doesn't risk being 90% vtuber dragon girl on wolf boy offpako fanfiction.

We can't use monster on monster because some innocent young guy's gonna click on it thinking it's about godzilla vs king kong and get scarred for life.

BUR #56374 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication lamia_with_lamia -> mamono_with_mamono
create implication taur_with_taur -> mamono_with_mamono
create implication mermaid_with_mermaid -> mamono_with_mamono

Someone on discord suggested this. "mamono" is another term for monster girls in the fandom which hasn't been corrupted by vtubers yet.

It might be the best option we have unless we want to go with something unwieldy like monsterfolk with monsterfolk or monstrous relationship, which is atrocious. It's a compromise like kodomo doushi, but feel free to propose other options if you have better ideas.

Regardless, I'll start populating it.

BUR #56375 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias monstrous_relationship -> mamono_with_mamono
create alias monster_people_sex -> mamono_with_mamono

Some utility aliases. I'm hesitant to do monster girl with monster boy for the reasons mentioned above.

The bulk update request #56374 (forum #424080) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

I think the tag should be monster_person_with_monster_person. I saw this tag and had no idea what the hell it was for until I checked the wiki. I don't know how prevalent "mamono" is within the fandom, but as an outsider I've literally never heard the term once in my life.

The bulk update request #56375 (forum #424081) has been approved by @nonamethanks.