Myth-of-Stars said in forum #420146:
Is it Q given the sexual context, or S since it lacks nudity?
Q
Placeholder1996 said in forum #420153:
S/Q check: post #10859382
G/S check: post #10859403
Q and S respectively.
Posted under General
Myth-of-Stars said in forum #420146:
Is it Q given the sexual context, or S since it lacks nudity?
Q
Placeholder1996 said in forum #420153:
S/Q check: post #10859382
G/S check: post #10859403
Q and S respectively.
Should this post #263396 be rated questionable instead of explicit?
TenaciousTurtleDucks said in forum #421222:
Should this post #263396 be rated questionable instead of explicit?
No, pussy juice is auto-E.
Not sure what the rating should be on this one, as while the girl seems to be nude here, the artist opted for a very Sanrioesque sort of art style that makes me not really sure what to rate it. As it's very much intended to be "cute" over anything remotely suggestive, so I don't like the idea of going anything over S.
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #422208:
Not sure what the rating should be on this one, as while the girl seems to be nude here, the artist opted for a very Sanrioesque sort of art style that makes me not really sure what to rate it. As it's very much intended to be "cute" over anything remotely suggestive, so I don't like the idea of going anything over S.
To be honest, she looks more like a muppet or critter in this than an actual human. I agree Q would be too high.
post #10957867
Vomit seems to get rated Q a lot, but it's also bright purple in this pic so I wanted to double-check if it's rated appropriately
S or Q?
pjoy said in forum #423562:
S or Q?
Q
post #10994176 G/S check
Edit, post #10116192 as well
Updated by Placeholder1996
post #11010382
S/Q check. I put it in S for now because the breasts in the face is unintentional and the focus leans heavily on more the non-sexual implications of such a situation.
post #11033048 This could be rated Q despite the exposed pussy, but I want a second opinion
Placeholder1996 said in forum #425046:
post #11033048 This could be rated Q despite the exposed pussy, but I want a second opinion
Yeah, I'd say it's Q. The pussy is exposed and visible, but it's not blatant.
𛁴𛂣𛀈𛁂 said in forum #426928:
Q, its only implied sex.
Just reverted the ratings of a few of these.
Obviously, pregnant women can be G, but pregnant children should definitely be at least S (and most might also need the loli tag as well). I feel like teen pregnancy (that is, teens that look or are implied to be underage) like post #2008668 and post #1361479 would probably also qualify for S, but I'd like a second opinion first.
I am totally sure this post can't cut for S as originally posted, but unsure if it should be raised to E since the "fluid" covering the egg is implied to be pussy juice as she had laid the egg or if is the case to give the benefit of doubt of suggestive fluid and keep as Q
Updated by KoakumaBR
KoakumaBR said in forum #431428:
I am totally sure this post can't cut for S as originally posted, but unsure if it should be raised to E since the "fluid" covering the egg is implied to be pussy juice as she had laid the egg or if is the case to give the benefit of doubt of suggestive fluid and keep as Q
Suggestive fluid is for when the fluid is clearly not sexual but is presented in a sexual manner. If you can't tell either way, then it should be treated as sexual fluid and rated E. This is also explained in the wiki.
post #11112981 S/Q. She's bottomless but most of it is cropped out of frame or hidden by her shirt.
Placeholder1996 said in forum #431921:
post #11112981 S/Q. She's bottomless but most of it is cropped out of frame or hidden by her shirt.
S is fine.
S or Q? If it weren't for that painting in the background, I wouldn't be struggling with this debate...