post #10956896 and child
Posted under General
post #10956896 and child
Placeholder1996 said in forum #422251:
post #10956896 and child
No. Clearly teenage. Look at her chest.
Placeholder1996 said in forum #422251:
post #10956896 and child
No.
Hips are wide enough, breast development, clearly a highschool student appearing illustration.
post #10974203
My first impression was that he's just making a face and it's not meant to be sexual, but skimming through the artist's other works gives me pause.
I do think it should be rated at least S, though, if only because of the bodysuit and the character's age.
post #2709081
post #1688260
The one with the clothes off seems like it would count as loli to me, not sure about the parent
Edit: Welp, nevermind, I'm a dumbass. I just realized I had the loli filter turned off on my search
Updated by TenaciousTurtleDucks
Age fourteen mentioned
gxc425 said in forum #424050:
tame, not lewd enough
TempAcc154260 said in forum #424074:
Age fourteen mentioned
does not matter; looks too tall for a loli
post #11010334 and children
Blank_User said in forum #424428:
post #11010334 and children
Her torso is not loli-like
asset #47165209
a check before I post
Missingno2024 said in forum #424751:
asset #47165209
a check before I post
And what is supposed to be lewd there?
hdk5 said in forum #424760:
And what is supposed to be lewd there?
I asked on discord and someone said no, but to get a second opinion.
The hips seem wide enough to not count as loli
Hereinafter said in forum #425215:
Those are not too-erotic swimsuits I think
