Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

trapster77

po-ju still deleted after appeal...
post #10645760

high quality guro post deleted
post #10861592
post #10861603

lots of chastity cage posts deleted. surely not all of this can be bad?

femdom chastity
post #10843996
post #10844117
post #10844141
post #10844089
post #10861529
post #10832371

trap chastity
post #10849641
post #10846986
post #10844195
post #10861478
post #10807833
post #10673816
post #10673792
post #10673796

male chastity
post #10861359
post #10771463
post #10843716
post #10843740
post #10847011

the penis faucet post that got pq'd 3 times but i still think it shouldn't be deleted just because it's oekaki
post #10843947

Reply
T-447AVBM

nyatbn said in forum #420583:

The reason for this is usually the gap between rich and poor. While the rich can upload their trash without any permission, the poor must submit to the mercy of a privileged few who look down on the hard work of the poor.

There's no need of talking things like 'the richs over the pools' here. As I take it, there's about hundreds of contributors here, while tens of approvers. So things will be accepted by tens' and 'things will be accepted by hundreds' are indeed different ranges , and the previous will be kinda stricter.

Reply
le scemo

John_Pillow said in forum #420670:

things will be accepted by tens' and 'things will be accepted by hundreds' are indeed different ranges , and the previous will be kinda stricter.

The problem seems to be that there is no objective standards of quality, even approvers debate about which posts are acceptable or not and so a large part of having uploads approved comes down to the approvers personal interests and it seems that if an approver doesn't find a piece of art interesting they just "leave it to someone else" despite there still being quality there.

Reply
NiceLittleDan

le_scemo said in forum #420694:

The problem seems to be that there is no objective standards of quality, even approvers debate about which posts are acceptable or not and so a large part of having uploads approved comes down to the approvers personal interests and it seems that if an approver doesn't find a piece of art interesting they just "leave it to someone else" despite there still being quality there.

You can't set objective quality standards for a subjective medium. The line of quality is arbitrary but there are some things a collective would say is bad and other things most would agree is good. Anatomy happens to be one of the main sticking points because it's more of an objective thing to critique about art.

Some approvers, including for a large part myself, approve a wide variety of things even if it's not something they'd upload themselves, whereas others have their certain niches. From the little experience I do have with it, rating:e stuff might get passed on more than other types of content, as well as long comics on occasion.

Reply
Mr.Ritsuka

Though this one is still pending approval : post #10884784 . I still have the question that sometimes my posts are quickly got approved. Others have to waited for hours or even days to be approved,sometime even got deleted despite their quality not really that poor to begin with. I would like to know the process and what kind of illustrations are more prone to be deemed “Not good enough” for the approvers,as some of the illustrations still got some upvotes or had a high resolution.

Reply
1 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 717