curious why this one didn't get approved post #10854907 (E)
while the same artist does have alternative versions similar this one active, for example post #10753723 (E)
Posted under General
curious why this one didn't get approved post #10854907 (E)
while the same artist does have alternative versions similar this one active, for example post #10753723 (E)
post #10842899
Judging by the number of likes, people liked it, so why was it deleted?
post #10874991
The post is still under review, but if there's something wrong with it, let me know right away. If the problem isn't too big, I'll try to fix it.
All right, I have added a source to post #10581576, which can hopefully finally tip the scale in its favor.
Thankfully FGsketch posts his commissions on social media.
erwt said in forum #420568:
curious why this one didn't get approved post #10854907 (E)
while the same artist does have alternative versions similar this one active, for example post #10753723 (E)
I appealed the post. Makes no sense to have two different bars of acceptance.
Strike1996 said in forum #420541:
I can't find any logical reason why they wouldn't approve the image.
The reason for this is usually the gap between rich and poor. While the rich can upload their trash without any permission, the poor must submit to the mercy of a privileged few who look down on the hard work of the poor.
werte.move said in forum #420569:
post #10838850
post #10853053
post #10611167
post #10015912
post #10523362
post #10838850 - Long, off-putting neck.
post #10853053 - Torso doesn't really make sense.
[...]
post #10523362 - Personally not a fan of styles like this so can't comment other than with that.
Tekasa said in forum #420574:
post #10842899
Judging by the number of likes, people liked it, so why was it deleted?post #10874991
The post is still under review, but if there's something wrong with it, let me know right away. If the problem isn't too big, I'll try to fix it.
post #10842899 - Upvotes and favs don't mean approvability.
post #10874991 - It feels kind of flat? The face and head esepcially lack depth to me. Keep up the good work though and don't be discouraged! Danbooru just has really high standards.
Hello, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #7613323
post #8021875
post #6777436
Updated by SidBarrett
can someone check my recent posts, no reason showing... they are all explicit futa
post #10830071
post #10830103
post #10830122
post #10830128
post #10830153
post #10830164
post #10830178
post #10830190
post #10830202
post #10830230
post #10830235
post #10830247
is there any reason why this is not approved, or there's something wrong?
Strike1996 said in forum #420541:
I can't find any logical reason why they wouldn't approve the image.
unfortunately, posts like these subject to scrutiny. there is a chance that it might be approved, but some refuse to approve posts like these due to reasons
NSFW:
post #9749506 Q
is there someone willing to approve this?
nyatbn said in forum #420583:
The reason for this is usually the gap between rich and poor. While the rich can upload their trash without any permission, the poor must submit to the mercy of a privileged few who look down on the hard work of the poor.
Sorry I can't hear you over the sound of wads of cash.
Said "poors" can revolt against the rich throwing trash on the streets via the "Flag" button on the sidebar when it smells really atrociously, and then they are also subject to the mercy of the super rich. Many such cases.
Submitting high grade materials onto the production line usually results in stable manufacturing that passes the inspection. Try to look over your cargo before loading them on, otherwise it may not be allowed to leave the dock or may face recall if they go out.
Translation of the above.
Blue member users can use the flag button if they think something is of poor quality no matter the rank of the uploader, just do so in good faith and not out of malice. (See howto:flag)
Uploading high quality art into the modqueue will usually see it get approved. Make sure you are uploading quality art that follows the upload rules (you can compare to other approved posts such as approver:any status:active if you're struggling with quality standards).
I got lost with the last part but you can appeal your posts, once personally for each post, if it doesn't pass and you believe it should. You can also consult the upload bounty thread (topic #24186) if you're struggling with finding high quality art to post.
NiceLittleDan said in forum #420635:
I got lost with the last part
"Leave the dock" = get approved and "face recall" = get flagged, I think.
post #10814483
why did this get deleted? doesnt seem low effort or that dated to be not approved for todays standards
NiceLittleDan said in forum #420635:
Translation of the above.
Blue member users can use the flag button if they think something is of poor quality no matter the rank of the uploader, just do so in good faith and not out of malice. (See howto:flag)
Uploading high quality art into the modqueue will usually see it get approved. Make sure you are uploading quality art that follows the upload rules (you can compare to other approved posts such as approver:any status:active if you're struggling with quality standards).
I got lost with the last part but you can appeal your posts, once personally for each post, if it doesn't pass and you believe it should. You can also consult the upload bounty thread (topic #24186) if you're struggling with finding high quality art to post.
The issue is the frequently used reasoning. When uploading content with with exaggerated proportions (huge, gigantic, not "hyper") the usual argument is "poor quality" or "upload rules". At the same time lots of images with the same kind of proportions are uploaded without any need for approval. I won't flag them, because i think they belong here. That makes flagging a very useless tool for achieving equality.
post #10848830
post #10849103
post #10856017
Any reasons on why these 3 got deleted ?
They might not be the best quality,but I don't think they are THAT bad .
