Posted under General
posts from bruhhdtv720p look like they're simply tracing over AI art.
watch some of the timelapses and you'll see what i mean: asset #44709830, asset #44728576,
it's like they're colouring in a paint-by-numbers kit, rather than working in stages the way real artists do
Updated by bipface
post #10847228 and this artist seem all AI. On top of that the nipples and genital being censored by a chibi like that i have seen from a number of AI gen accounts. Eyes are also very suspicious.
It's called a character censor and human artists already do this a lot, like using Koharu (Blue Archive) even for things completely unrelated to Blue Archive.
WRS said in forum #419946:
It's called a character censor and human artists already do this a lot, like using Koharu (Blue Archive) even for things completely unrelated to Blue Archive.
You don't think it's AI then? From the shading to the eye textures, to even the character censor art. It looks very close to AI art you can see on Twitter or fanza. Very soon we won't be able to tell at all I suppose.
No actually, I don't have any comment about the other things you identified, just that the character censor is not indicative of AI.
MilkDelivery said in forum #419952:
You don't think it's AI then? From the shading to the eye textures, to even the character censor art. It looks very close to AI art you can see on Twitter or fanza. Very soon we won't be able to tell at all I suppose.
I think it’s at least ai-assisted, quite possibly fully generated. forum #419901.
post #10537564
Flagged without tagging. Any validity to the claim?
ion288 said in forum #419977:
post #10537564
Flagged without tagging. Any validity to the claim?
Their lit.link directly mentions using AI. Also see her tassel and golden parts.
I think bruhhdtv720p may be ai-assisted, their speedpaints and heavy usage of tags on Twitter is suspicious. No artist will color bit by bit without any flat color, there's no sketch or accidents they need to go back to fix, just feels weird.
post #10842747 twitter #1981514840150569024 twitter #1986413239698063532
Thanks for the swift answer.
I immediately found post #10593694 with the same problemI admit to not knowing how to read metadata, can someone verify this?
Updated by ion288
Quoted when I meant to edit :-[
Surprised this artist has passed any checks at all. Their posts on X have barely any time between them. It is at minimum AI-assisted, but even then, no human can pump out so much artwork. Please perform a check. All of the art is not tagged properly in spite of being possibly AI-generated. The style and overall way it's drawn don't match human internal consistency.
Dev0lution said in forum #420127:
Surprised this artist has passed any checks at all. Their posts on X have barely any time between them. It is at minimum AI-assisted, but even then, no human can pump out so much artwork. Please perform a check. All of the art is not tagged properly in spite of being AI-generated.
Post frequency isn't proof of anything, you have to show actual issues with the art.
Read a bit in the Danbooru Discord. Apparently, their style is extremely similar to that of AI slop. Found out I can just blacklist instead of arguing back and forth, even if to me it seems like AI.
Updated by Dev0lution
post #10857331 The lace and "floral" pattern on her underwear is all kinds of wonky, what seems to be common AI smuding near the man's ring finger, the bow on the garter belt is fucked and most suspect of all is her left ear accessory being completely wrong.
Established artist with no other AI posts. Nothing obviously AI as far as I can see. Disingenuous flag?
ion288 said in forum #420137:
Established artist with no other AI posts. Nothing obviously AI as far as I can see. Disingenuous flag?
I don't see any evidence either, seems like a bad flag.
Ars said in forum #420133:
post #10857331 The lace and "floral" pattern on her underwear is all kinds of wonky, what seems to be common AI smuding near the man's ring finger, the bow on the garter belt is fucked and most suspect of all is her left ear accessory being completely wrong.
The lace trim on the bra and gloves is definitely suspect. I think this might be AI.
Placeholder1996 said in forum #420141:
The lace trim on the bra and gloves is definitely suspect. I think this might be AI.
That alone is not enough to just call it AI outright, especially when other stuff seems to be consistent. I'm looking through their account on arca to make a better decision choice.
Cabman11 said in forum #420175:
That alone is not enough to just call it AI outright, especially when other stuff seems to be consistent. I'm looking through their account on arca to make a better decision choice.
How is that not enough? There are clear AI artifacts in the trim; if it is ai-assisted, the artist didn’t do a good job cleaning it up.
