AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

B17Bomber said in forum #419024:

Do you mean like a call out thread on Twitter with proof? I remember seeing one a few days after the guy deleted everything. I'll try to find it again

It doesn't matter what it is as long as it's actual good proof, not some schizophrenic rant by either our users or some Twitter user. Wikis like this need to be backed up because otherwise they're just a breeding ground for unfounded accusations. If artists just state they use AI in their bios then it's fine, but the fact that there has been discussion about them for a while already indicates it needs to be backed up.

It might be helpful if you could actually list what the artifacts are so they can be better inspected. Two were recently flagged, one that contained a flag pointing out the issues and another one that was a little more dubious since it just pointed to a Twitter crashout rather than an actual area to look at for the supposed AI-ness of the picture. Ones that are cleaned and blurred like this are a bit more difficult to see.

hasu_no_tokimeki said in forum #419594:

Excuse me, this is the AI-generated art check thread. What are you talking about?

Yeah my bad I guess I explained badly, but they were sniffed out for making AI

I'm not sure on the procedure should I just tag as AI and flag the non-deleted ones? And I'm not sure if it's generated or assisted