post #10649787
This is a work I commissioned from the artist in 2024. Versions uploaded before that had a faint watermark throughout the pseudonym, but this one has none at all.
Posted under General
post #10649787
This is a work I commissioned from the artist in 2024. Versions uploaded before that had a faint watermark throughout the pseudonym, but this one has none at all.
NervousG33k said in forum #414938:
Still hasn't been deleted
Then don't ask about it, especially twice in the span of mere hours. Your post has two days left and many posts get approved at the last minute. Wait until it's actually deleted before asking again.
Two good Pine arts, would like to know the reasoning why they didn't go through?
Blank_User said in forum #415035:
Then don't ask about it, especially twice in the span of mere hours. Your post has two days left and many posts get approved at the last minute. Wait until it's actually deleted before asking again.
I promise you it won’t get approved. It’s obvious it won’t.
post #10620810
"1 approver believe it has poor quality" Really?
<br/>
post #10545641
Updated by 馮福水牛校軾昆
can you tell me why 17 arts were rejected, while the other 20-30 arts from the same artist, of the same quality, were accepted?
for example these:
post #10657844
post #10657835
post #10657820
post #10653228
post #10657393
post #10662121
All other posts from artist were approved
What is wrong with this art works by hudie jun post #10488186 and post #10488207, did I make a mistake when posting them or did not enough reviewers saw it?
any reason why this didn't go through? It's official art and pretty nicely drawn too
post #10639003 -- appealed twice and hesitant to appeal it again. its pretty milquetoast. ive seen worse approved on here
caneandtie said in forum #415209:
post #10639003 -- appealed twice and hesitant to appeal it again. its pretty milquetoast. ive seen worse approved on here
I can't really say anything about the image quality but I suggest waiting longer in between appeals and posts being deleted, doing it right away will just make an approver skip it again because they think "saw this before, didn't care and still don't"
Remuan said in forum #415234:
I can't really say anything about the image quality but I suggest waiting longer in between appeals and posts being deleted, doing it right away will just make an approver skip it again because they think "saw this before, didn't care and still don't"
i see. thanks for the advice :-)
post #10660206post #10660201
post #10660192post #10660187
post #10660177
Would like to know what's wrong with these? All are pretty nicely drawn and are in good quality
Updated by TheGamingRodent
taso said in forum #414615:
Any nose hook enjoyers in the chat to complete this set?
post #10624842post #10624843post #10624844post #10624845post #10624846
I guess this is simply too niche
Updated by taso
I'm still hoping to get feedback on why this was declined. I think it looks gorgeous.
Updated by StarfishAtLarge
As I predicted it would, this was unapproved and deleted.
Whatever could be the problem with it? It’s mind boggling.
Not even gonna bother appealing, it’s pointless, it’s going nowhere.
I just want to know why it wasn’t approved.
Too bad I’ll never know why, since approvers rarely answer anything here.
I don't get why these weren't approved