nsmrtmr1 said in forum #415105:
Dual_persona and solo are not mutually exclusive, why is this search included here?
It's not mutually exclusive, but it's often a mistag, like post #10569269.
Posted under General
nsmrtmr1 said in forum #415105:
Dual_persona and solo are not mutually exclusive, why is this search included here?
It's not mutually exclusive, but it's often a mistag, like post #10569269.
Ylimegirl said in forum #415106:
It's not mutually exclusive, but it's often a mistag, like post #10569269.
This search seems to be tossed in-between a bunch of other tag combos that are mutually exclusive (besides multiple persona and solo) so if it's meant to be there as something that gets often mistagged then there probably should be some sort of a note saying as much.
nsmrtmr1 said in forum #415105:
Dual_persona and solo are not mutually exclusive, why is this search included here?
Because in the VAST majority of cases it is, in fact, incorrect.
In the first page alone I'm seeing a lot that are definitely not solo or that dual persona is a stretch on (post #10650303, post #10594306).
The only type of thing I can really think of where the combination would make sense would be something like post #10558150.
I assumed most people have the common sense to understand that there is always some level of case-by-case nuance. You can have a solo reference sheet too, but I included it for example because it is almost always multiple views. But I'll add a note I guess.
Just going to drop these here because technically my regex page is currently exclusive to commentary, so.
Updated by Ylimegirl