The bulk update request #52765 (forum #411090) has been approved by @evazion.
Posted under General
The bulk update request #52765 (forum #411090) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #52773 (forum #411108) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #52777 (forum #411113) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #52779 (forum #411116) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #52066 (forum #404514) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #53136 has been rejected.
nuke pool:21151
I don't think we need a pool for this on second thought. Do we really need tags of specific anniversary milestones? Because alternatively we can convert this pool if it's worth keeping as a concept.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
BUR #53136 has been rejected.
nuke pool:21151
I don't think we need a pool for this on second thought. Do we really need tags of specific anniversary milestones? Because alternatively we can convert this pool if it's worth keeping as a concept.
I personally think it's worth keeping
Alixiron said:
I personally think it's worth keeping
What's so special about the tenth anniversary of this franchise that it would warrant its own pool, or even its own tag? The fact that the pool description even provides a tag name used on Twitter that we could use ourselves gives it even less of a reason for it to be a pool, but again, why should this specific copyright get its own exclusive anniversary tags when others don't?
I do see some tags with an idolish7 qualifier, which I suspect may refer to the costumes. If they do, they should be renamed, and if they don't, they should be nuked.
Blank_User said:
What's so special about the tenth anniversary of this franchise that it would warrant its own pool, or even its own tag? The fact that the pool description even provides a tag name used on Twitter that we could use ourselves gives it even less of a reason for it to be a pool, but again, why should this specific copyright get its own exclusive anniversary tags when others don't?
I do see some tags with an idolish7 qualifier, which I suspect may refer to the costumes. If they do, they should be renamed, and if they don't, they should be nuked.
Others could get their own too. There's a bunch of posts like post #9901988, post #7365647, post #7150145 etc. which don't have the hastag in the commentary so without a pool or tag it's not possible to find them
Alixiron said:
Others could get their own too. There's a bunch of posts like post #9901988, post #7365647, post #7150145 etc. which don't have the hastag in the commentary so without a pool or tag it's not possible to find them
Why not just add the anniversary tag to the first two? The commentaries in both make it clear they were made to celebrate it.
Blank_User said:
Why not just add the anniversary tag to the first two? The commentaries in both make it clear they were made to celebrate it.
Yeah that works. Would have been better if the bur updated them with anniversary too instead of just nuking it
Most of the images in the pool were already tagged anniversary to begin with. I went ahead and manually tagged the stragglers, so the BUR should be fine as is.
Honestly, my idea was more a generic "X anniversary" milestone to be used for any series, but I think that would probably end up too much a mess. The reason I chose to just flatout nuke it was for the reasons Blank described: There is nothing special about Len'en's 10th anniversary that it needs its own pools. It's just pooled for the sake of being pooled.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
Most of the images in the pool were already tagged anniversary to begin with. I went ahead and manually tagged the stragglers, so the BUR should be fine as is.
Honestly, my idea was more a generic "X anniversary" milestone to be used for any series, but I think that would probably end up too much a mess. The reason I chose to just flatout nuke it was for the reasons Blank described: There is nothing special about Len'en's 10th anniversary that it needs its own pools. It's just pooled for the sake of being pooled.
That's great. No complaints on my end then anymore
Similarly to the anniversary discussion above, I've been maintaining a pool for Re:Stage! Prism Step's birthday card art (pool #25748). I used to just tag these with birthday, but then put them in a pool because I thought maybe it wouldn't be appropriate for a lot of the posts since most of them don't indicate a birthday is being celebrated in the image. The only way you'd know is from the card title, which I have to put in a comment. If the pool:25748 -birthday posts actually do qualify for birthday, then I wouldn't object to nuking this pool, but if not, then I'd argue the only way to find them would be through the comments, which I think would be too inconvenient since you'd have to know exactly what to search for. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
BUR #53178 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:14570
(Anus Dimple)
This is just covered anus. I don't think the remaining search of pool:14570 -covered_anus applies but it's not my thing.
The bulk update request #53178 (forum #412547) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #53747 has been rejected.
nuke pool:28135
(Accurate Ballet)
Isn't this just a ballet but better favgroup as pool?
I think anything that is an actual pose or routine is better off having the name of the pose or routine instead.
C.C. @pipirupirupirupipirupi as the pool creator.
Also, this pool is full of Princess Tutu. Which on the one hand I get, but also is a huge red flag for pools I think. Having tags for various poses works a lot better, unless someone more knowledgeable on ballet can successfully argue for tag conversion instead.
BUR #53756 has been rejected.
nuke pool:3032
nuke pool:4470
nuke pool:782
nuke pool:2032
nuke pool:6435
nuke pool:4983
nuke pool:5172
nuke pool:2142
nuke pool:4276
nuke pool:3574
This may be controversial, but the more I think about these pools, the less I think they are needed. By this point, they are little more than pet pools to be filled at leisure with whatever. All of these can easily be search for with a tag (Like "Beautiful Dark Smile" could be searched for with evil smile specifically). These are way too subjective for tags, but also suck as pools. I think it would be wise to consider killing them, or at least beginning preparations to kill them in some way.