Posted under General
hanwen1234 said:
Gonna need a second opinion in this, tattoos seem inconsistent but it could just be the artist getting a little lazy.
Not sure, but some details are questionable. Tattoos are inconsistent, so is the hair ornament between the versions. The lying one has an oddity with her left eyelid and some fabric weirdness going on below her right knee (as in, going down the leg).
Updated by Alabel
hanwen1234 said:
Gonna need a second opinion in this, tattoos seem inconsistent but it could just be the artist getting a little lazy.
https://twitter.com/Kin_Nexs/status/1986072926144368942
Check the symbol on Bridget’s head, completely garbled
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/125889106
Extremely inconsistent shadows
Compare: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/123731112 and https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/123731079
Inconsistent designs while drawing the same characters
Seems very cut and dry AI
ANON_TOKYO said:
Can you point out specific features that lead you to believe that (beyond just vibes)
Tongue is melting into hair. Neck is melting into hair. Eyeballs look scrambled to a degree. Nipples look flat and undetailed. Index's hair is melting onto his face.
The art style they are drawing with is hugely different from their past style.
Freshblink said:
AI Assisted? The artist could draw in the past before AI, but their style changed to something similar to stable diffusion.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/135194058
Look at the legs
Seems likely, they suddenly have a lot of inconsistencies when drawing the same character
SaltExplosion said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/135194058
Look at the legsSeems likely, they suddenly have a lot of inconsistencies when drawing the same character
Yeah, I am noticing this on other illustrations.
Probably worth just adding AI assisted tags to newer drawings.
Is it possible to check if they are using AI?
All of the work by yatagarasupen tagged ai-generated with only a few being flagged. How true is this?
post #10555886
Didn't get tagged, so I wanted more eyes on this one.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
All of the work by yatagarasupen tagged ai-generated with only a few being flagged. How true is this?
This was brought up a few days ago at forum #411285
Alixiron said:
Is it possible to check if they are using AI?
I can't be sure. But looking through their pixiv I can't help but feel suspicious, especially since I had years of watching dad and brother paint watercolors. Aside from the fact that these pictures feel very generic, that is a lot of them released with short intervals between. Then there are the photos of finished works on pixiv. The artist says they're making A4 paintings, but doing so to the very edge tends to misshape the watercolor paper. Watercolor tends to be difficult with details, and on A4 that would be so much worse to do, yet the artist nails them all and if there is a tide mark, it feels like a rare accent rather than commonality. That being said, there are ways around it, like painting a larger picture and cropping it down, as well as applying certain agents to the paper than can later be removed. Edit: come to think of it, aside from the two first pictures here, are all the other in 848 x 1200 size?
Updated by Alabel
Alixiron said:
Is it possible to check if they are using AI?
They are selling watercolor_(medium) on auctions.yahoo.co.jp and got 22 reviews.
I wouldn't say these are fake reviews.
eromelon said:
They are selling watercolor_(medium) on auctions.yahoo.co.jp and got 22 reviews.
I wouldn'y say these are fake reviews.
People do sell AI art on yahoo auctions so I don't think it's sufficient
Knowledge_Seeker said:
Yeah I noticed, but it got kinda buried and I wasn't sure how true the claim was even from that.
I have a few examples in the post (the last being extremely important). I don’t want to accuse based on vibes; I looked through a lot of examples and these are just the most glaring.
I don‘t think it‘s AI generated. Assisted maybe, some hair strands do look weird. But not enough to judge this worth of deletion for AI.
SaltExplosion said:
https://twitter.com/Kin_Nexs/status/1986072926144368942
Check the symbol on Bridget’s head, completely garbledhttps://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/125889106
Extremely inconsistent shadowsCompare: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/123731112 and https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/123731079
Inconsistent designs while drawing the same charactersSeems very cut and dry AI
I flagged post #10552585, but someone still re-approved it despite this.
hanwen1234 said:
I flagged post #10552585, but someone still re-approved it despite this.
The flag said "possibly AI". I guess NNT didn't believe it really was.
post #10555886 is flagged without a tag. It's not something I would want to reapprove but it would be good if it could be tagged or maybe refuted in a comment.
Also post #9459626
If anyone could tag it or tell me if this isn't AI would be great. Same for the post above.
ion288 said:
Also post #9459626
If anyone could tag it or tell me if this isn't AI would be great. Same for the post above.
post #10555886
I don't see how this is AI; lots of clean lines and no obvious artifacts. If their complaint is with a blurry background, that's depth of field, not AI.
post #9459626
I think it would be reaching to call this AI; no overt artifacts and the artist has no works tagged with ai-generated or ai-assisted. Some lines do look a little melty, but I don't think it's enough to be conclusive.
Placeholder1996 said:
post #9459626
I think it would be reaching to call this AI; no overt artifacts and the artist has no works tagged with ai-generated or ai-assisted. Some lines do look a little melty, but I don't think it's enough to be conclusive.
I think other people pointed out some more points, but the way the braid melts into the collarbone is quite tell-tale for AI, and not something a human does.
