Loli/shota check thread.

Blank_User said:

It sounds like you want something like a canon_loli tag, though I think actually making a tag like that would be a bad idea since it would draw negative attention from certain groups.

I don't think that's what he wants. Feels like the definition of a loli is really anely strict and unless a girl looks extremely young... a lot of the things that are not-loli here would have any non-Danbooru brained person thinking it is one. If post #10459202, post #10521764, post #10479232, etc etc are loli, then I don't see why at least one of those Theresa pools are not

To be fair, as someone who also wants to search for lolis positively (as blacklisting practically is just a negative search), I also want to have a more loose way to search for what I enjoy.

czernin said:

I don't think that's what he wants. Feels like the definition of a loli is really anely strict and unless a girl looks extremely young... a lot of the things that are not-loli here would have any non-Danbooru brained person thinking it is one. If post #10459202, post #10521764, post #10479232, etc etc are loli, then I don't see why at least one of those Theresa pools are not

I don't think post #10479232 fits our current definition of loli either (post #10521764 is borderline, no opinion on post #10459202). And Theresa looks quite a bit older in those pools than the characters in these example posts (yes, even the Theresa with a flat chest).

As long as the loli and shota tags are used to hide content from regular users, we can't broaden its coverage unless we're forced to. It was only a few years ago we were allowed to apply it to Sensitive posts, for example. We'd need to create an entirely new tag that would somehow not raise alarm bells for payment processors.

Aiyah... even posting and checking is needlessly complicated. I don't think I should make an entire new topic for checks on a single tag but it's also hard to figure out when to tag either without possibly angering anyone who likes those tags given that there are furious gardeners of the tag, so it leaves me at a loss when I see something I'd prefer not to but have no way to sanely evict it from my results then and there. There doesn't really seem to be a good solution besides just blanket blacklisting entire sets of things because of a handful of posts.

I don't want a new tag for this situation actually, I just wanted to figure out if the posts in question qualified for either tag because at least to me it seems like they do, not just knowing the characters but because of the perspective they're in showing.

Maybe I've got to set up a userscript that adds a button on posts matching a certain tag string that will post here on behalf of me doing so manually if I see something that I want a quick check on...

nvm

Blank_User said:

post #10167089 and children

These seem pretty loli to me. Not sure why the tag was removed.

Mistake on my part, you can re add it. Someone was mass tagging this character incorrectly in most cases, must have glazed over when reversing.

post #10541759

artist #594507
Idk if therese are questionable enough to be loli

post #10556817 and its siblings

Torrearcilla said:

artist #594507
Idk if therese are questionable enough to be loli

The first one probably is, at least. The others are probably fine.

WRS said:

post #10556817 and its siblings

I think so, yes. Tagged.

post #10557933
The rest of the body was covered by her gigantic breast but you can tell from the lower half it's a loli, no?

Rathurue said:

post #10557933
The rest of the body was covered by her gigantic breast but you can tell from the lower half it's a loli, no?

Not really.

Rathurue said:

post #10557933
The rest of the body was covered by her gigantic breast but you can tell from the lower half it's a loli, no?

No.

Does post #10551721 really count as loli? I get that the content of the image may be sensitive, maybe even questionable when translated, but all you are seeing from Ibuki here is a close-up of her head.

rainyd said:

Does post #10551721 really count as loli? I get that the content of the image may be sensitive, maybe even questionable when translated, but all you are seeing from Ibuki here is a close-up of her head.

Either way, those images should've been translated before applying the tag.

post #9822177

don't think this needs it but I'll run it through here

post #4152065

throne_spl said:

post #9822177

don't think this needs it but I'll run it through here

No.

post #10564629

Joe_kido said:

post #10564629

Age diff yes.

But not enough to hit shota.

post #10563697
pretty loliful