Posted under General
Artifacts on the eyes on post #10517152. Not sure if there is sufficient enough retouching to call it AI-assisted or not, along the lines of what's been deemed acceptable for poki (j0ch3fvj6nd). Their old stuff seemed to be fine but the new isn't looking so hot.
Even more artifacting than I expected. Deleted it.
Updated by WRS
BUR #52731 has been rejected.
mass update xel4 -> ai-generated status:deleted
A thread has surfaced accusing Xel4 of AI generation and tracing to create fake lineart.
https://bsky.app/profile/thescarletdevil.bsky.social/post/3maxupyhnus2z
The bulk update request #52731 (forum #410974) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
Tracing AI is AI-assisted, not AI-generated. The latter tag is for works that are fully and completely done by AI or are insufficiently retouched, the former is for significant retouching which can be anything from fixing defects and cleaning it up enough that there is visible human effort shown in the final piece to completely redrawing the image using the generated image as a guide/lineart.
That being said, that doesn't make it flag immune. AI-assisted works with visible issues or that don't meet quality standards can and should be flagged.
The accusation is that the works are fully AI-generated, and the artist simply traced over them to show the lineart as "proof" that they drew it themselves.
Looking at the illustrations, I do see signs that they are AI-generated, such as all the shading/rendering/crosshatching being unnaturally uniform.
https://media.tenor.com/D7CFCtZcy6EAAAAM/disappointed-dismay.gif
The art is even stamped with "AI use disallowed" (NG 無断転載 AI学習) to try to cover it up lol. What a shame.
Updated by andlabs
post #10474962 , post #10475324 , and post #10475324 show numerous examples of inconsistent character design from the same artist (especially in what’s supposed to be a continuous set), from things like earrings, bangles, and the inner ears not matching between them.
post #10475324 is a particularly egregious examples, as the bikini segment on the right has more stripes than the one of the left. This combined with their high art volume in their first year, tagging practices on pixiv, and generic art style seem like a clear cut use of AI.
Oh, and the six fingers aren’t helping the case either
https://twitter.com/AdamElJefe/status/2006545774210081202
Something about his artist's work looks too polished: https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/104743935
Xirtr said:
Something about his artist's work looks too polished: https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/104743935
I'm not sure I would use the word 'polished', let alone 'too polished'.
Flag no tag. Please tag or refute.
Design discrepancies and bad anatomy in non-posted works, very new artist with a high volume of generic art.
https://twitter.com/mafufim/status/2002826713647161787
(see hair ornament)
https://twitter.com/mafufim/status/1973851357380767970
(Bad anatomy, hand/knuckles)
https://twitter.com/mafufim/status/1959031363119829423
(Bread)
Someone added ai-generated tag to this and later it got flagged. Looking at artist's previous works here, I honestly can't tell if this one is actually AI or not.
VR-Man said:
Someone added ai-generated tag to this and later it got flagged. Looking at artist's previous works here, I honestly can't tell if this one is actually AI or not.
The stockings/fishnets have some obvious errors, lot of finer details mismatched, and really sus anatomy (Look at Dorothy’s foot and hand)
ion288 said:
Flag no tag. Please tag or refute.
It's already been tagged, but the eyes seem like AI to me.
VR-Man said:
Someone added ai-generated tag to this and later it got flagged. Looking at artist's previous works here, I honestly can't tell if this one is actually AI or not.
As stated above, the fishnets have lines appearing and disappearing randomly, also the bra and panties on the character in the upper left have nonsense patterning.
VR-Man said:
Honestly just looking at the whole picture gives me a feeling of wrongness. Patterns on clothes generally feel inconsistent, some of the buttoms are either missing or warped, girl with brown hair in bottom left corner should have her right index finger checked, but if you want a more convincing evidence? The girl to the left of her. Look at the foot sticking out from beneath her and where it should have been. Edit: holy shit, look at the girl with pink hair on the right side. Where the hell are the legs of the white haired girl?
Xirtr said:
So, you don't think it's AI?
As far as my eyes can tell, it's not AI. Of course I would appreciate being proven wrong, considering the way AI improves the more art is stolen for training.
Updated by Alabel
post #10530660
So the accusation is that it might be assisted? Untagged of course.
