Posted under General
did some more looking through my old deleted uploads
first off just some sketch that i like
post #6081373
i uploaded some hirohiko araki art a while ago and i guess its a toss up if they get approved or not looking at his artist page. i feel like this one should be approved though if another golden wind one was
post #5514394
Hi, any feedback on why this post wasn't approved? Please give it a second chance:
post #7613323
Updated by SidBarrett
post #10495312
can someone explain what sort of anatomical nonsense the approvers are talking about here? it looks totally fine to me.
Catching up on the week I missed reading this thread.
cyberthundercider said:
post #10457344 was unapproved by 14 approvers, even though some of axys's work i uploaded here was approved, and nothing is substantially different...
Bad anatomy
NeptuneStarPrime said:
Any reason why this post was rejected
post #10219518
Fringe quality and bad legs.
Redgalt said:
both very high quality artwork
Bad arse anatomy
physicistismagician said:
Early Merry Christmas!
Hi, I am not sure if this is the place to ask but what are the criteria of Koikatsu posts?
post #10448405 post #10448406 post #10448407 and post #10459105 haven't made the cut so I thought some feedback would be nice as to not repeat the mistake in the future.
It's not impossible for koikatsu to be approved but it is very unlikely. I'd personally only ever approve it if it's of exceptional quality, a sentiment that seems similar amongst other approvers.
nyatbn said:
What is wrong with post #10467292? It might not be the most creative work, but quality wise it looks fine to me. Did i miss something?
As I said with the rejection message, the leg is abd. In particular, aorund the knee area. The face is also kinda eh. The clothes are drawn well but it doesn't make up for the anatomy imo.
Space_Force_Detective said:
Why were these 2 deleted, they're easily up to the quality of the artist's approved works, the first especially
I'm not the one who's been approving these as they're not my style but the faces on the two you highlighted look worse to me than the approved one's. Faces can be one of the biggest deal breakers for visual approvability.
Strike1996 said:
The overall anatomy feels kinda off.
TheGamingRodent said:
Would like to know what's wrong with these?
These two are of lower quality, which can especially be seen when compared to the rest of their work imo. Anatomy on the second is also off.
仰山楊愛民 said:
The first post has a weird looking perspective that doesn't feel right. The second has bad arse anatomy imo.
ForeskinThief said:
did some more looking through my old deleted uploads
first off just some sketch that i like
post #6081373i uploaded some hirohiko araki art a while ago and i guess its a toss up if they get approved or not looking at his artist page. i feel like this one should be approved though if another golden wind one was
post #5514394
The sketch is low quality imo. The Araki piece is good but do you know where you got it from? It is currently sourceless.
LuxuryRay said:
good quality IMO
Hands look kinda bad because of the shading. Because of where they are in the frame, they're noticebale and detract from the rest of the piece imo.
post #10501353
Wondering why this one got deleted, the only thing I can think of is the artist watermark but it's not that large or obtrusive? Not the end of the world, I guess, just confused since I uploaded several posts just before this that all got approved near-immediately.
akifly said:
post #10501353
Wondering why this one got deleted, the only thing I can think of is the artist watermark but it's not that large or obtrusive? Not the end of the world, I guess, just confused since I uploaded several posts just before this that all got approved near-immediately.
The watermark is fine. I can only speak for myself, but I have issues with her left arm, specifically the shoulder blade.
The other in-game artwork for A Hat In Time by Jenna Brown has been approved. Are there any details in these that prevent approval or that I should check for when adding art to pool #23538?
Appealed this one…
post #10503774
And I’m still unclear on why (explicit) post #10481397 and its children were unapproved.
post #10481777
post #10332969post #10347356
Would like to know why these didn't go through? They're pretty nicely drawn
Updated by TheGamingRodent
post #10332082 (part of an ongoing pool)
post #10384803, Can someone explain to me why this post was deleted?
Literally every other post from this artist has been approved, what makes this one different to be deleted?
Updated by Xirtr
post #10503931
I feel like this may have just slipped through the cracks since it's a fan-made card, but I'd like to know if there's some other issue.
nsfw:
post #10468969
post #10192878
post #9607312
post #9357970
post #8943244
post #7319933
sfw:
post #7784091
post #8016408
post #8268368
post #9404739
post #9593578
any help on why these were unapproved? which ones do you think i should appeal, if i can ask for advice?
Mimizu_Worm_Egg said:
nsfw:
post #10468969
post #10192878
post #9607312
post #9357970
post #8943244
post #7319933sfw:
post #7784091
post #8016408
post #8268368
post #9404739
post #9593578any help on why these were unapproved? which ones do you think i should appeal, if i can ask for advice?
I wish I could give you some advice, but they all look fine to me. I guess some of the colors look muddy but I have seen posts like that get approved before.
Xirtr said:
post #10384803, Can someone explain to me why this post was deleted?
Literally every other post from this artist has been approved, what makes this one different to be deleted?
Appealed it for you and it seems to have passed through now.
I'm surprised this didn't get approved. To me, it looks beautiful.
I just appealed it, hoping for the best, but I'm curious as to what people who turn it down think is off about it.
Updated by StarfishAtLarge
post #10510560
It doesn't break any rules, and in my opinion it's of good quality.
