Dalamar said:
post #176506
The fuck? How can you, of all people, not use the proper linking method?
Posted under General
Dalamar said:
post #176506
The fuck? How can you, of all people, not use the proper linking method?
Not sure if it's really sexually charged enough for the tag or the rating. It was rated e at first, but I changed it to q for obvious reasons. Could MAYBE be rated s, but I didn't wanna make that decision on my own.
How about post #388929?
Actually, this character's (hinata yuuhi) non-s-rated images seem to be tagged inconsistently - half are marked loli, and half are not, without any real logic applied that I could tell. Barring any exceptional cases, shouldn't they all be considered the same in regards to being loli or not?
post #388929: The sheer size difference between her and the guy implies quite a bit. The small figure also doesn't lead me to believe she's more than a tiny step into puberty; the facial design would agree.
That said, this one is on the borderline. I wouldn't add a loli tag to it, but I wouldn't remove it if someone else saw fit to add it, either.
without any real logic applied that I could tell.
I disagree; the logic seems plainly obvious.
The only pic of her engaged in sex that isn't marked loli is post #373298, where enough of her body is covered that it becomes impossible to discern her figure. Thus, it wouldn't be correct to tag that one as loli. The rest of the images featuring her having sex were tagged.
I'm leaning towards the guy being a shota but I can't really be sure.
I suppose these slipped through.
Athal said: maehara_shinobu sex
I suppose these slipped through.
At a (very) quick glance at the thumbnails, they don't strike me as loli. Did you have particular ones in mind?
Those that I saw in that tag search that weren't marked loli don't really deserve the tag, from what I can see.
In fact, many of those that did have the tag might not deserve it.
Do keep in mind that any given character can be drawn in a multitude of ways, and that this may or may not result in them appearing as loli.
Hell, Shinobu herself was drawn fully-grown in the epilogue chapter of the manga.
Maybe it's because she's right next to someone who looks far older, but wouldn't this image warrant the loli tag?
Lenz said:
post #234349Maybe it's because she's right next to someone who looks far older, but wouldn't this image warrant the loli tag?
My instinct would be not to add it, though I see where you're coming from.
They certainly look young, but then again so do all girls sekihan draws and not all of them are tagged as loli. Plus most of the other pictures of these characters aren't tagged as that either.
buemba said:
post #661668
I'm pretty sure that's a penis in a cocksock on that one on the right.
However, I can't really make out much in terms of relative age on him. Anyone else want to chime in?
post #661986: Without a shadow of a doubt, loli.
post #619835: Suggestive enough to warrant it.
jjj14 said:
post #293009?
Why was this even approved in the first place? Oh, whatever.
Nipples visible, so it's questionable on that front, but I think it's about the same level of "suggestiveness" (if it can be called that, here) as a couple kids getting a bath from their mother. (i.e., none.)
post #656189: Yes; the body shape and style definitely fits.
post #655508: Same here.