Posted under General
post #10345215
post #10345171
post #10345259
post #10346773
post #10346874
post #10347097
I still don't understand why this artist's arts skcd loen are no longer approved. Even appeals don't help
The artist draws quite well, without anatomical errors, and the drawings are complete. Yes, there are small unpainted holes, but this is simply part of his semi-sketchy style and a distinctive feature
Sorry for my English, I'm still learning ʕ´•ᴥ•`ʔ
dividebyzero said:
100% Agree.
Alternative is called "approval begging", or tryharding enough until you become a contributor and you won't have to wait for your quality-but-niche images to be approved.My bordfunker133 images, for example, have been approved partially because the right approver saw them, the rest were deleted and tanked my upload limit.
yeah, I try posting good art but my upload limit was slashed too
NiceLittleDan said:
To those asking for moderation and general reform to the approval process, you're entirely free to do so and to voice your opinions in a well-intentioned way, but it's kind of hard to take the arguements seriously when it's coming from people with histories of not taking on board advice and criticism.
There also needs to be some genuine attempts from some people in this thread to reflect upon the posts they've made and understand why they aren't being approved. It's hard to end up with high deletion ratios by getting unlucky, especially if you already have hundreds of posts.
If you can't see the quality issues with posts such as post #10452541 (E) or post #10295814 then I really don't know what to tell you. Look at status:active approver:any to get an idea of the kind of quality expected or look at users with low deletion ratios if you want. Failing that, use this thread in good faith and hopefully someone will get back to you. If the post is obviously bad then you probably won't be taken seriously in this thread.
A reminder that much like uploaders, approvers do this voluntarily. Things aren't always going to be 100% when there's subjectivity on what counts as "high-quality" but drastically lowering standards would negatively impact the viewing experience on the site.
To anyone else reading this, please do not approval beg. As for Dividebyzero, my very first day as an approver you sent me a dm on discord asking me to check your posts to which I warned you not to do so (as I now do with everyone who asks me the first time around). You continued asking for about a month until I finally felt the need to cease communication with you. Additionally, you specifically have been told to stop doing it in the discord server generally.
Please stop trying to act like you're only ever innocently asking for feedback when you have been told multiple times by myself and others to not beg for approvals explictly or implicitly.
Feel free to follow up by dmailing me as I don't wish for this to become a bigger issue than it needs to be in an otherwise irrelevant forum.
OK, we will try to use this thread in good faith
I'd like some feedback on these posts
Variations got approved just fine, no idea why this one would be excludedpost #10420361
I understand that this artist has an unconventional artstyle, but I think these posts are to standard in comparison to the rest of the uploads under their name, all of which are activepost #10407349post #10365569
Looks good to me, artist's other work are almost all approved, not sure if I'm missing somethingpost #10246719
Not sure about this one, is it the hands?post #10058077
Shoulders too sharp? Nose too sharp? Bad profile? I'm not sure, I would love a second opinionpost #10023775 (Questionable)
Certainly amateurish but I don't see anything that I would classify as below standardpost #9962020
Don't see anything bad about this one, artist's other works are active and this piece is to their standardpost #9906611
Is it the hands? They are not very detailed but I don't think there's anything anatomically incorrect about them, artist's other works are active and on the same standard in my opinionpost #9617905
It's solid pixel art in my opinion and it fits the standard of the artist's other work, no idea why these two would be rejectedpost #9746994post #9746920
All of them got approved, thanks!
Updated by LifeInAsh
i was wondering if i could get some feedback on these posts
post #10412366
seems a fine enough on par with other works approved from the artist
post #10444012
also seems fine since it matches the artists other works of the oc
Need to know why these didn't go through despite being official art? They are well drawn as well
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Feedback on this please. Picture is well drawn, artist's other works are all approved as well.
Updated by BigBara
post #9572919
post #9572126
post #9572899
post #9572136
post #9572170
These aren't my posts, but I'm curious why they aren't approved and are being ignored. In my opinion, they are drawn in anime style without any anatomical errors and deserve to be on this site (╭ರ_•́)
post #10447962 (rating Q) - Only thing I can really see wrong with this is her midsection being narrower than her hips.
post #7380304 (Q) - I guess Baiser's head and breasts are what failed this one.
post #7142896 (Q) - No glaring issues IMO, just kinda basic.
post #7122882 (S) - No glaring issues.
post #7080445 (G) - No glaring issues.
post #7077706 (S) - I'm guessing Tsushima's face is why this one failed to make the cut.
post #7080487 (G) - Tsushima looks kinda bad in the final panel so I guess that's why this one failed.
post #6805947 (S) - Pretty plain, but it's not bad per se.
Some of these are very old but I'm trying to get serious about contributing, even minorly, so a second opinion on these will help.
i seek again feedback on the posts that weren't reconsidered a week ago and new posts that haven't been approved
lost mediapost #10431941 and post #10437854 were the only ones i upped by teiku (take) that didn't get approved
some cute sfw traps that didn't get approved for some reason
post #10399368 bridget
chastity cages / explicit traps / femdom
post #10428022 by mashima jirou
post #10426665 and post #10426633 by nanamatsu kenjipost #10426326 akai mato
post #10437779 and post #10437783 by kyomugyuu
post #10443581, post #10443634 and post #10443545 by kami tora
posts that variants of approved posts
post #10342684 part of a comic series and the 2 other posts in the pool got approved but this wasn't
post #10410369 uncensored ver of 2n5 art from their blog, but it's third party source because the blog is dead so the image was pulled from gelbooru
yassy
post #10448190 animated ball busting variant of an approved post
post #5600113 animated longer non-looping variant of the above posted by someone else that i found in the deleted posts
yah yah 6
post #10447805 and post #10442865 are "sample" images at the end of free posts with a paid reward available showing a preview of the paid reward. i was told it would be okay if they weren't just cropped images but had something different. the rest of the pools were approved
ball busting art by pokonyan but it's much better draw than most posts of the genre... after appealing twice and asking about it for the third time now this will be the last time i ask about them :(
post #10177097
post #10177164
Updated by trapster77
post #10332082 (part of an ongoing pool)
Why were they deleted?
All other art by ja6m6 is approved and most of it is active. Is there anything uniquely low-quality about this one that I overlooked?
Update: Thanks WRS!
Updated by drinkyourvegetables
post #10444220
post #10444194
(nsfw)
Is there any reason why these two posts got deleted? The artist has over 100 uploads and both posts got +200 votes
post #8662634 (textless version of parent post #7530043)
post #8620763
post #8667127
post #8985914
post #8390173
post #10420274
I uploaded this because its much higher quality than the image that was already present on danbooru. Did I do something wrong here?
