Loli/shota check thread.

post #10435495 it doesn't seem like loli to me

Placeholder1996 said:

post #10435495 it doesn't seem like loli to me

I would keep the tag on, her crotch is basically on full display.

All r:general, tag not applicable.
post #10438302
post #10438319
post #10438341
post #10438345
post #10438354
post #10438363

Not loli
post #10434135

Freshblink said:

I would keep the tag on, her crotch is basically on full display.

She appears to old for a loli.

hdk5 said:

She appears to old for a loli.

...No, she really doesn't.

Confetto said:

...No, she really doesn't.

Nuh huh. Yes she does.

hdk5 said:

She appears to old for a loli.

I would assume shes 13, which is close enough. I wouldn't put her in the petite category either.

post #10439751

aster1a said:

post #10439751

No.

hdk5 said:

Nuh huh. Yes she does.

This is literally the exact type of image I expect and want to be hidden as someone who blacklists loli. She looks 13 at the absolute most, and even that feels like a reach. I have no idea what you're seeing here.

i'm with confetto here. if she's too old to qualify for loli, then what the hell does?

Yeah, I'm leaning towards loli myself. And I hope we get a better argument against her being loli than "Nuh-uh."

Definitely loli, in my opinion.

hdk5 said:

She appears to old for a loli.

I can't say she appears any older in that image than the girls in for example post #10418900 or post #10440578 which you tagged as loli.

post #10454400
post #10454465
post #10454495

These apply to the oppai_loli tag imo, but I'm not entirely sure if they apply to loli.

FJA2KJYAR said:

post #10454400
post #10454465
post #10454495

These apply to the oppai_loli tag imo, but I'm not entirely sure if they apply to loli.

I don't think these count as loli. I'm also doubting whether they'd actually qualify for oppai_loli.

post #10455488
Errmmmmmm

I don't think post #10449985 and post #10449987 are lewd enough for the tag, unlike two other siblings.

hdk5 said:

I don't think post #10449985 and post #10449987 are lewd enough for the tag, unlike two other siblings.

If they're young enough to count for the other two, then it definitely applies to post #10449987 (partially see-through naked towel) and probably also post #10449985 (skin-tight swimsuit).

post #10455907