henmere said:
It looks like ford's right shoe melts into the jeans, hard to be certain because of the resolution. I'm also suspicious because of the artist's history (ai-generated deleted posts, forum #386334, forum #400663).
Posted under General
henmere said:
It looks like ford's right shoe melts into the jeans, hard to be certain because of the resolution. I'm also suspicious because of the artist's history (ai-generated deleted posts, forum #386334, forum #400663).
tamalewolf said:
artist: oroborus - this is at least aI assisted right? If you check their twitter they have drawings that aren't covered in the very specific type of skin glare you see in all these ai images, and those drawings were as recently as 2024.
Glossy skin or glare isn't enough on its own for proving ai-generation. I don't see anything obvious myself.
Just want to make sure whether they use AI or not, because one post uploaded here was tagged AI, while the other wasn't.
Updated by VR-Man
The twitter account's bio appears to say the illustrations were made by AI.
pixiv #138067014
pixiv #138067532
pixiv #138067558
Way too new account in Pixiv. Just want to make sure.
MaskedAvenger said:
pixiv #138067014
pixiv #138067532
pixiv #138067558Way too new account in Pixiv. Just want to make sure.
A lot of Chinese artists tend to be very established on Chinese sites, start wanting to post on sites outside that sphere, and then dump a lot of art on Pixiv. This appears to be one such case to me.
MaskedAvenger said:
pixiv #138067014
pixiv #138067532
pixiv #138067558Way too new account in Pixiv. Just want to make sure.
https://space.bilibili.com/1377926022
https://www.huashi6.com/painter/68476
Adding onto what Knowledge Seeker said, they have a few accounts on Chinese sites including some traditional art
Flag without a tag. The approver remark about a signature added in post seems irrelevant.
ion288 said:
Flag without a tag. The approver remark about a signature added in post seems irrelevant.
It could be AI. The hair ornament, the clasp for the cape, and the hilt all look artifacty. I can’t look at their other works though since their account is protected, so I’m not 100% certain. Agreed about the signature not being evidence; people add stuff like watermarks and signatures all the time to traditional media in editing softwares.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Placeholder1996 said:
It could be AI. The hair ornament, the clasp for the cape, and the hilt all look artifacty. I can’t look at their other works though since their account is protected, so I’m not 100% certain. Agreed about the signature not being evidence; people add stuff like watermarks and signatures all the time to traditional media in editing softwares.
post #10357151
Ai-generated, breaks the rules
artist #93880
Is it just me or does this artist seem questionable?
Torrearcilla said:
artist #93880
Is it just me or does this artist seem questionable?
No, they're human. They have a glossy look on their posts, but I think that's their style rather than anything ai-related.
And todays flag is post #10359505
Hands are hard, could be a human error.
Hello, I would like to raise some concerns about the use of AI in the drawings by osidid and morrin (itsmorrin) (as well as two other artists, but one is already considered to be AI and the other is not present on danbooru). This follows two threads posted by muds on X, which provides evidence of the links between these four accounts and the use of AI.
The threads :
- part 1 : https://x.com/_muds_/status/1992982113763865028
- part 2 : https://x.com/_muds_/status/1994095428036653550
What do you think?
ion288 said:
And todays flag is post #10359505
Hands are hard, could be a human error.
I really wish people would do basic research before flagging or accusing. That art was posted on Pixiv on May 29, 2020, before AI-generated art even existed. Obviously, human drawn.
there's a pretty credible Google doc about asami-chan using AI as far back as 2022 and even faking WIPs to cover their tracks. It seems the wiki was already Updated but only 2 of their 250 uploads have been marked for AI and nothing flagged yet. thought the mods might wanna look into that
The Doc: https://twitter.com/terupancake/status/1995328321698074982?t=S_f4kxOZTAuEpCLTFaIyMg&s=19
Placeholder1996 said:
I really wish people would do basic research before flagging or accusing. That art was posted on Pixiv on May 29, 2020, before AI-generated art even existed. Obviously, human drawn.
Sorry I missed that before asking here 😖
Next is post #10326685
Hair looks fine to me. Artists other post was deleted but never tagged.
B17Bomber said:
there's a pretty credible Google doc about asami-chan using AI as far back as 2022 and even faking WIPs to cover their tracks. It seems the wiki was already Updated but only 2 of their 250 uploads have been marked for AI and nothing flagged yet. thought the mods might wanna look into that
The Doc: https://twitter.com/terupancake/status/1995328321698074982?t=S_f4kxOZTAuEpCLTFaIyMg&s=19
The accusations involve tracing, which would be AI-assisted by Danbooru's standards (which isn't inherently banned).
ion288 said:
Next is post #10326685Hair looks fine to me. Artists other post was deleted but never tagged.
Yeah, I saw that flag yesterday. Agreed about the hair; the only thing that might be AI-ish is the buttons on the shirt, but humans can draw them like that too. It’s also worth noting neither dimension is divisible by 8. I think this is more likely human than not.
Confetto said:
The accusations involve tracing, which would be AI-assisted by Danbooru's standards (which isn't inherently banned).
What's going to happen with the more obvious ones, like post #6508981? A lot of her earlier art also uses obvious AI backgrounds that probably were just used as is, no tracing involved.