Why was this art deleted, it’s quite good IMO post #10299726
Posted under General
Why was this art deleted, it’s quite good IMO post #10299726
post #10305333
post #10302749post #10305381
Would like to know what's wrong with these? I don't anything wrong with them personally
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Literally what's wrong with it?
Updated by Crossland
post #10285552
post #10304658 (Active parent)
post #10304660 (Active parent, 7 approvers)
post #10304665
post #10304841
post #10305528
post #10305565
post #10305579 (Larger version of post #9512746)
post #10305817 (6 approvers)
post #10303695
post #10305794
post #10305804
post #10305810
post #10305826post #10305844
Most of these posts only saw 6 approvers, a couple of them got 8, but idk what the issue is with them is regardless. Felt like these posts generally measured up with whatever the average approver would see as ok for the site.
Updated by BigBara
post #10282567
I think this one is original enough and cute, what's lacking?
post #10281690
post #10282009
These are of good quality I believe
post #9972051 was accepted, but why wasn't post #10303713 accepted? both the same product
Why was this rejected?
post #10159477
Diegodeir said:
post #10299858 (G)
Hi, I would like to know what's wrong with this post, to me it's a very normal one with good quality. Thanks
Any feedback?
NeptuneStarPrime said:
Why was this rejected?
post #2899510
feedback yet?
any reason these were not approved?
Space_Force_Detective said:
Why was this art deleted, it’s quite good IMO post #10299726
For another piece of 'Zelig fan art, why was this Sister of Battle Coco not approved, to my eye it looks really nice and I'd assumed it was a shoe-in for approval post #10309798
Space_Force_Detective said:
For another piece of 'Zelig fan art, why was this Sister of Battle Coco not approved, to my eye it looks really nice and I'd assumed it was a shoe-in for approval post #10309798
post #10310316 And for another, it's a very good emulation of DD's style, why was it denied.
only 8 approvers check this
Updated by drinkyourvegetables
Why were these 2 posts deleted?
The former is a sound version of an animation that's already posted on this site as a GIF. I'm assuming that perhaps it counts as a third-party edit? Although I didn't see anything in the rules prohibiting sound edits to animation. I also got permission from the original artist and tagged them on Twitter.
The latter is beyond me. I'm guessing his work isn't particularly liked here.