AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

ion288 said:

post #9950185

Bad faith flag?

That got flagged? Is anything with shiny skin AI-generated now? The armpit hair alone looks human (see also post #9771176), and the way they draw the folds in the armpits is very detailed and not messy. There’s also an artistic error on post #9444275 where the artist didn’t color the torso in completely on the left side below the breast (asset #36777495); I’m not sure a machine would make a mistake like that. They also had a noticeable trend of improvement over the years in their art. Almost certainly human.

Updated by Placeholder1996

czernin said:

post #10281156

Suspicious on this one, the link provided in the commentary is someone's Facebook page full of other AI generated things and I just feel like the car looks weird (on the tires mostly) and the general car-to-uma ratio feels like she's way too big for it

Yeah no, I think that's AI too. It also doesn't get Agnes Tachyon's racewear correct at all (that design is notorious for it's very prominent sleeves past fingers, alongside other details missing on this post an actual artist would catch).

Also, the background hills are utterly nonsensical when it comes to vanishing point.

czernin said:

post #10281156

Suspicious on this one, the link provided in the commentary is someone's Facebook page full of other AI generated things and I just feel like the car looks weird (on the tires mostly) and the general car-to-uma ratio feels like she's way too big for it

It’s hard to be certain because of the resolution, but the left eye looks really weird to me. It’s also worth mentioning that it’s a file upload with no online source or artist; together with the other deficiencies pointed out, I’m suspicious.

Ailook said:

post #7721070

this artist use ai, his style changed abruptly more than once before.
Now he uses the same AI slop technique as other AI creators like Artllatar

I don’t see anything wrong with their art. Just because an artist “changes styles” doesn’t mean they’re using AI. What “AI slop technique” are they using? If you’re going to accuse an artist of ai-generation, please actually supply proof rather than vibes or style. forum #376402, forum #376406

Placeholder1996 said:

I don’t see anything wrong with their art. Just because an artist “changes styles” doesn’t mean they’re using AI. What “AI slop technique” are they using? If you’re going to accuse an artist of ai-generation, please actually supply proof rather than vibes or style. forum #376402, forum #376406

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=11100823
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10505643

old artworks he delete where the ai details where more obvious. you can even see how the artstyle is no consise, and yes a constant change on style in short times, is a proof of change in the Prompt model used to generate the pics

Updated by user 1452122

Ailook said:

old artworks he delete where the ai details where more obvious. [..]

This doesn't prove anything; for all you know, they could have originally been a generator and then leveled up to tracing or actually creating art. "Previous" work is a flimsy argument at best without correlating it to their current work and if there has been no change; and each post is judged on its own. Generalisations like this are ignorant at best and malicious at worst, which wouldn't be the first time for this topic.

WRS said:

This doesn't prove anything; for all you know, they could have originally been a generator and then leveled up to tracing or actually creating art. "Previous" work is a flimsy argument at best without correlating it to their current work and if there has been no change; and each post is judged on its own. Generalisations like this are ignorant at best and malicious at worst, which wouldn't be the first time for this topic.

Generalization? It's obvious; it's the strategy of most AI tracers. Just look at the shape of the lines and how they delineate, even details like the highlights in the eyes and certain drops of sweat, even in the line art. That's what happens when you run AI's work through several filters, a very common and inexpensive technique for mass-producing art. It's not that someone can't improve their art, but going from being a tracer like this: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10019254
start using ai: post #7721070 and end with the generic cheap liner ai generted: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=12108911 and all in lest than some months. It's exactly the same process that other well-known creators like mereoleonart, redpostit, zeojjen, arllatar, buronjin, etc.

Updated by user 1452122