ion288 said:
post #9665285
Flag without a tag. Please tag or refute.
I could use a second opinion, but I don’t see anything blatantly AI. edit: one of the stars on her hair looks a little weird, but it’s hard to tell if that’s AI or artistic choice.
Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #9665285
Flag without a tag. Please tag or refute.
I could use a second opinion, but I don’t see anything blatantly AI. edit: one of the stars on her hair looks a little weird, but it’s hard to tell if that’s AI or artistic choice.
ai-tracker said:
Is Cromwell using AI? What’s going on with the fingers of the girl sitting down? No human would naturally grip something using only their middle and ring fingers while spreading the other two apart. AI can now render the correct number of fingers, but it still relies on a limited set of hand poses and this awkward grip is one of the common ones it uses.
When I look up thigh grab, the (very NSFW) results show that this hand is, for some reason, common:
post #7788414
post #8078853
post #8999579
post #9485812
post #9491510
post #9504467
post #9614949
I also specifically checked posts before 2021-12-31: post #4767597, post #4961952
People just decide to draw it like this. Unnatural as it may be, it's probably not an indicator of AI.
Updated by 8253803
Just wanted to let a comment and compliment for y'all here, danboooru's stance on AI generated artwork so far is the most effective one so far, the moderation is good and most bad artwork gets unapproved, that helps both the artists, the viewers here and ofc the AI researchers who uses this to train models too.
I swear, thank you all here too for reporting AI artwork. This can really mess up datasets with artificial data and also it's just bad to be together as if it was real human created artworks.
Would like opinions on randomscribblas because I'm now fairly confident that all or most of their images are AI with minor edits. On top of the fact that their style changes practically every few images:
post #9297775 does not match up very well with post #9354659, which makes me think the "sketch" is generated and then used to generate the colored image
post #9354659 the stitching on the capelet randomly turns into blurry smudges, and the hair merges with the capelet on her right shoulder and with her face around her left eye
post #9348671 the lock of hair has smeary ends, right foot looks off and has weird toes, hand under the feet has bizarre finger lengths
post #9396258 and post #9369136 are both bad upscales with areas painted over and off-looking frills
post #9364299 the toes look very strange to me
post #9517695 hair merging with jacket, nails don't look right, artifacts around left eyebrow and ribbon and just generally everywhere
post #9641601 and post #9676744 are both just straight-up 832x1216
slow.motion.shadow said:
Would like opinions on randomscribblas because I'm now fairly confident that all or most of their images are AI with minor edits. On top of the fact that their style changes practically every few images:
post #9297775 does not match up very well with post #9354659, which makes me think the "sketch" is generated and then used to generate the colored image
post #9354659 the stitching on the capelet randomly turns into blurry smudges, and the hair merges with the capelet on her right shoulder and with her face around her left eye
post #9348671 the lock of hair has smeary ends, right foot looks off and has weird toes, hand under the feet has bizarre finger lengths
post #9396258 and post #9369136 are both bad upscales with areas painted over and off-looking frills
post #9364299 the toes look very strange to me
post #9517695 hair merging with jacket, nails don't look right, artifacts around left eyebrow and ribbon and just generally everywhere
post #9641601 and post #9676744 are both just straight-up 832x1216
post #9354659 looks ai-generated indeed, the left eye blending into the hair looks blatantly off, same with the unnatural smudges near her fingers, and the lines near her eyebrows are also inconsistent.
post #9612747
Not gonna approve it but it would be good if someone could tag or refute.
I'm so fucking embarrassed I uploaded AI...Anyway, I'm out of flags,so may someone flag these two for me? Thanks.
Guess that goes to show you should never get careless...
Knowledge_Seeker said:
I'm so fucking embarrassed I uploaded AI...Anyway, I'm out of flags,so may someone flag these two for me? Thanks.
Guess that goes to show you should never get careless...
ouch, I've been there; I feel your pain.
asset #29098197 The hair ribbons and bows on her bikini look strange to me; however this artist has multiple good works that predate the rise of AI art, so I'm not certain if it's AI or just strangely drawn.
Placeholder1996 said:
asset #29098197 The hair ribbons and bows on her bikini look strange to me; however this artist has multiple good works that predate the rise of AI art, so I'm not certain if it's AI or just strangely drawn.
This hat from their other drawing also looks strange: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/132077531
But it's also distinct from how AI would draw. In fact its complex shape and intersecting lines are beyond what AI can do as of now. So, maybe they're taking stock photos and applying filters to them to make them look painterly? I'm not sure.
Was looking through their art and noticed the unsymmetrical eye pupils and messy eyebrows closed-up. Though the artist has a several arts and comics way before ai-generated work is a thing, I have been suspecting that they have been using AI-assist in current days. To add on, their artstyle looks very similar to spacezin (style) , unless I'm wrong on that and they have their own artstyle instead.
Most of their work is only available in high-quality on patreon, which fuels my suspicion on whether they're trying to use AI work to earn money.
Correct me if I'm wrong though
CarsonOng said:
Was looking through their art and noticed the unsymmetrical eye pupils and messy eyebrows closed-up.
This artist's style is very scribbly line texture, so their shading consists of random lines instead of thick brushes, and is impromptu, which is probably why their eyes aren't symmetric and their eyebrows look messy.
To add on, their artstyle looks very similar to spacezin (style) , unless I'm wrong on that and they have their own artstyle instead.
Their shading and linework are vastly different. Just zoom in on a face. spacezin uses a much wider variety of brush size and completely blends the shading of their hair. the golden smurf always still have distinct lines in their shading.
Most of their work is only available in high-quality on patreon, which fuels my suspicion on whether they're trying to use AI work to earn money.
I don't understand this part. Paywalling high quality version is the purpose of Patreon.
check these:
post #9698854
post #9698863
Verify recent posts of artist #205099. Someone newly registered added the ai-assisted tag to six posts.
馮福水牛校軾昆 said:
check these:
post #9698854
post #9698863
Those were posted by a spammer with links posted in the comments; I’m almost certain they’re AI from that alone. Additionally, the cleavage cutout in post #9698854 has the familiar line melting common in AI “art”.