AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Placeholder1996

wispydreamer said:

I think It's AI. pixiv #131849217 has weird garbled eyes, the chain also looks incredibly messy in a way that makes no sense for a real artist. The gag also changes colors in a very AI way. pixiv #132188454 Why are some of the speech bubbles smooth while the others are aliased? Also Fern's hair ornament keeps changing and doesn't look correct. pixiv #129366059 The girl's eyes change colors between all of the images, purple at first then green then purple but heterochromatic at the end.

alright, thanks for the confirmation

Reply
aster1a

VR-Man said:

Richard4648

Need a check on this one.

post #9574281 The zipper looks awful to me (I need someone to check her braids too). And the lineart abruptly changes on her arm, but I don’t know if it’s common.

post #9574288 Something weird’s happening there… I see shades of blue appearing out of place on her pantyhose (thigh) and her (viewer’s left) ribbon seems to be merging with her hair.

Reply
Placeholder1996

Popkornikus said:

Do you think this might be AI-generated? I went through the author's works and didn't spot any obvious mistakes, but I'm still unsure

pixiv #131009289

I would say not. The shoes are very detailed here, and that's the kind of detail work that I'd expect AI to screw up; the belt in the same image is also very detailed. The detail work is just as good in their other posts; they're also not posting very often, which you'd expect for someone making art of good quality. I think you just stumbled into a talented artist.

Reply
MarqFJA87

MarqFJA87 said:

Apparently much of artist #401537's work is either entirely AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted. I'm linking the following thread for context.
https://x.com/ZaphnArt/status/1921723133544816916

Also, artist #350302 is almost certainly using AI to replicate the art style of Mage (harumagedon); the way that the Ranma-chan posts look are practically indistinguishable from those of Mage's.

Still waiting for feedback on these two cases.

Also, several of rokosannn's are giving me gen-AI vibes. Inconsistent style from one piece to another, occasional suspicious similarity to another established artist's styles, and anomalous hand anatomy that is more often than not associated with gen-AI... I honestly can't shake it.

Reply
eromelon

MarqFJA87 said:

Still waiting for feedback on these two cases.

Also, several of rokosannn's are giving me gen-AI vibes. Inconsistent style from one piece to another, occasional suspicious similarity to another established artist's styles, and anomalous hand anatomy that is more often than not associated with gen-AI... I honestly can't shake it.

idolmia:
https://x.com/IdolMia_/status/1930776653388468403
garter straps connected to the panties
https://x.com/IdolMia_/status/1939836350473384006
https://x.com/IdolMia_/status/1939111577971560531
https://x.com/IdolMia_/status/1937299632457154981
https://x.com/IdolMia_/status/1935487698154004563
the direction of the animal head of Usada Pekora's scarf changes again and again

Reply
123kid

ion288 said:

post #9563553
Please tag or refute.

We had the Shexyo discussing a dozen times here already and the verdict was always the same. Why can some people not accept that? Danbooru is not the morale police of the art community. Personal dislike towards the artist should not matter and no one can tell me that the flags aren't made out of a personal grudge towards the artist for something they did years ago.

>messed up window in the background
The slide window is half opened.....

I don't mind the art getting the ai-assisted tag since it's easily believable that they use AI to a certain degree but if we wanna treat their uploads now as fully generated I want to see prove of that. And if not, other artists like unfairr, rinjo18, amiki_yuzuru or poki_(j0ch3fvj6nd), just to name a few, need to be treated the same.

Reply
los angeles

demu said:

I would like some opinions on satokocel extremely new account
post #9556990 with 4 finger hand
also started advertising commissions with multiple styles?

There is no doubt that this is AI-generated. Normal human painters draw the whole picture first and then the details. The position of each finger is reserved from the beginning, so there will never be a wrong number of fingers or toes. For example, this post:
post #9498152
The toes of the character on both feet in the painting are wrong to varying degrees, but the author does not mark this work as AI-generated, which is disgusting.
Human painters may not draw well enough because of lack of experience, but they will never draw the wrong number of toes.

Reply
123kid

123kid said:

We had the Shexyo discussing a dozen times here already and the verdict was always the same. Why can some people not accept that? Danbooru is not the morale police of the art community. Personal dislike towards the artist should not matter and no one can tell me that the flags aren't made out of a personal grudge towards the artist for something they did years ago.

>messed up window in the background
The slide window is half opened.....

I don't mind the art getting the ai-assisted tag since it's easily believable that they use AI to a certain degree but if we wanna treat their uploads now as fully generated I want to see prove of that. And if not, other artists like unfairr, rinjo18, amiki_yuzuru or poki_(j0ch3fvj6nd), just to name a few, need to be treated the same.

Since it got deleted for AI I will now proceed to flag the other artists for the same use of AI. I hope you're consistent with your judgement there too.

Reply
1 155 156 157 158 159 160