AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Kaleidoscoped said:

tagged but not flagged, same artist

Reasons by tagger via PM:

Nakitama said:

I'm an artist, I know what AI art would look like, clearly, the artwork in the post are just traced from an AI images, I can even tell which engine they use to generate the images in which they traced from. [...] About the artist, I did a couple of research on their social media, they do have some legit skill before 2023 but there is a trace of them using AI in their work in recent years, their coloring style have a major shift after 2023 which is a normal thing but there is a consistent pattern of each artist's artstyle progress overtime, which Cawfield pattern is not natural and very inconsistent. [...] Before this I didnt aware that ai-assisted tag exist so that is my bad. [...] I very dislike AI-art or any kind of AI exploit and I just want those to be properply tagged and stay permanent on my blacklist.

I suggested to them to flag the posts with reasons, but, well, they didn't. Personally I don't see those posts being generated. They have almost the same quality (and issues, like backgrounds) as older posts of the artist.

Gardares said:

Reasons by tagger via PM:

I suggested to them to flag the posts with reasons, but, well, they didn't. Personally I don't see those posts being generated. They have almost the same quality (and issues, like backgrounds) as older posts of the artist.

removed the ai-generated tag. the only thing that points towards ai assistance to me is the shading on post #6301918 looking vaguely like something that ai would generate, so i'm not quite convinced on the ai-assisted tags either, but i'll leave them for now.

Placeholder1996 said:

post #9257646 I found this artist on Pixiv independently of the work posted here; their art seems suspicious to me, especially the boutonniere here. I want a second opinion before I flag it though.

I personally don't really suspect AI involvement. That boutonniere doesn't seem to have any signs of AI to me, and the artist's style is very very consistent all across the board. Just seems to be an ordinary artist from China to me.

Knowledge_Seeker said:

I personally don't really suspect AI involvement. That boutonniere doesn't seem to have any signs of AI to me, and the artist's style is very very consistent all across the board. Just seems to be an ordinary artist from China to me.

alright; something just seemed off, but could easily just be my eyes. Thanks for looking over it. Maybe I'm just a bit paranoid after being burned a few times by AI art that looked good to me before I realized what it was.

Placeholder1996 said:

alright; something just seemed off, but could easily just be my eyes. Thanks for looking over it. Maybe I'm just a bit paranoid after being burned a few times by AI art that looked good to me before I realized what it was.

No worries. I was pretty paranoid myself several days after accidentally uploading AI myself. It's good to be cautious.

Their artworks give off a Stable Diffusion (or some other AI-gen) feel. The weird glossiness, hair strands merging one with another in weird ways in some posts, the faces and how they look at the viewer.

Updated by sycer13

ai-tracker said:

I create art ... I long to dedicate more time to creating my art, ...

Yeah, the speed this person creates is unhuman and shading is very AI-ish. Also nice how they're deliberate with the wording in their "About" page. Like they're trying to avoid any legal issues.

Placeholder1996 said:

asset #27288031 This is a newer artist with a handful of works posted here. The hair here looks a little funky to me.

Almost two months on pixiv, zero followers. No other links.
Also on post #9546859 if you look carefully how hair spread on her back around scapula, you can see that one lock almost became an another bra strap and even dug into the skin.
Also single boob towel at post #9543055, lol.
Also all their pics are square.