This is me asking for help in this forum again, because sometimes Pixiv ignores I have the option Do Not Show AI enabled; and when I find something nice, there's a high probability that it's AI-generated slop...
Posted under General
This is me asking for help in this forum again, because sometimes Pixiv ignores I have the option Do Not Show AI enabled; and when I find something nice, there's a high probability that it's AI-generated slop...
InsomniacTwin said:
This is me asking for help in this forum again, because sometimes Pixiv ignores I have the option Do Not Show AI enabled; and when I find something nice, there's a high probability that it's AI-generated slop...
It looks consistent enough with the author's other output not done in a chibi style that I'm willing to hand the benefit of the doubt, but that's a sample size of four from the artist's pixiv, I'm not sure why the heart speech bubbles are doubled, but there may be a nuance to Korean art I'm not getting since I can't read Korean unlike Japanese and Chinese.
It's a noticeable bump up in quality compared to the artist's other stuff and has some color lines that are making me a bit suspicious.
argentb said:
It's a noticeable bump up in quality compared to the artist's other stuff and has some color lines that are making me a bit suspicious.
I took a look at the source of the image and it is kinda strange, admittedly..
Apocalyptosaurus said:
It looks consistent enough with the author's other output not done in a chibi style that I'm willing to hand the benefit of the doubt, but that's a sample size of four from the artist's pixiv, I'm not sure why the heart speech bubbles are doubled, but there may be a nuance to Korean art I'm not getting since I can't read Korean unlike Japanese and Chinese.
Thanks for your help, I'm going to try to dig a little deeper for extra evidence just to be 100% sure.
InsomniacTwin said:
Thanks for your help, I'm going to try to dig a little deeper for extra evidence just to be 100% sure.
The main reason I'd be suspicious is that the artist doesn't have any other socials linked. But that's not definitive proof of anything. If you know someone who's more familiar with the Korean art scene be sure to ask them.
post #8312373 and all later works by this artist.
Their latest works are significantly higher in quality and in a different style than their previous arts, although I don't have a sharp enough eye to spot any smoking guns.
asset #26247985 It passes the eye-check, but this artist only has 3 works posted and their artwork is already of a high quality. It makes me suspicious... Unfortunately, I don't have the requisite knowledge to investigate further.
On the fence on this one. Posts one everyday, Twitter account opened last April. No AI tags on any past posts in Pixiv.
I just want to bring up that this artist https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=egc0212&z=2 (pixiv: https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/9448782 ) using AI on their recent works, but I looking for second opinion.
I believe his sketches are his own, but the coloring and finishing are using AI
MaskedAvenger said:
On the fence on this one. Posts one everyday, Twitter account opened last April. No AI tags on any past posts in Pixiv.
I believe it is AI-generated. Look at her ear and eyes, especially her hair.
MaskedAvenger said:
On the fence on this one. Posts one everyday, Twitter account opened last April. No AI tags on any past posts in Pixiv.
I also came across this artist today. In one of their other posts (I can’t remember which), a halo was messed-up in a very AI-kind of way. Edit: here it is - https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/131249867. The halo in the upper right corner is definitely AI.
Treia said:
832x1216 lol
That's definitely AI-generated, that resolution is one of the few that SD officially supports. You can also look at the shoulders, where her physical shoulder has flat, sharp angles. Even if someone had sketched or outlined this before filling it in/drawing over it with a painting program it wouldn't produce those lines.
I do want to flag/mark this one as AI but i dont want to accidentally make a mistake.
I do think it is though
post #9450839
Please tag or refute.
ion288 said:
post #9450839
Please tag or refute.
...Seriously? Can you at least try to look for stuff (like the freaking artist's wiki jei games) before asking here?
post #9460759
The art here is generated by an AI-artist which I am not sure whether if it counts as AI-assisted or AI-generated since there's a Polka pasted on the phone and a bubble, but the entire thing is still AI-generated so I need some opinions before trying to add new tags.
Is this AI? I can't really tell. I don't know since I can see clear brushstrokes with that absurdly large resolution.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=eco_376124+&z=5
yuuchuu said:
Is this AI? I can't really tell. I don't know since I can see clear brushstrokes with that absurdly large resolution.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=eco_376124+&z=5
IMHO the fact that they can pretty consistently show layer work in many of their pieces on pixiv makes it very unlikely to be AI, they're just an insane person who willingly draws at resolutions that big for the kind of money blue archive players can throw around. Might be AI-assisted, but then I can see human brush-strokes and again, they can separate their work into background layers, layer in other objects et al which would be way beyond the effort level most AI gooners would be willing to put into a piece. Now my eyes are fairly bad even with glasses but the finer details look generally consistent. I think it's a case of art like this being frequently used to train AI models so it looks AI esque.
Updated by Apocalyptosaurus
post #9360022 is tagged with ai-generated and active (I'd change it to ai-assisted personally, but wanted to ask here first). I'm also asking about smewed artwork as a whole since three posts from them are tagged as ai-assisted (@Veraducks, @Diet_Soda, any help?) and artist's artstyle and quality look inconsistent sometimes. It's as if some of their artworks are drawn, while others look suspicious as if they were generated.