WRS said:
I know that you're really playing into this AI witchhunting persona of yours so much so as to buy access to gain more information, and it is unfortunate to have that revealed (I'm surprised I didn't catch the mention of it), but I should remind you to be careful about how you present words. This would qualify as AI-assisted, which unlike AI-generated is not against the rules to upload. There are many artists who have active posts here who trace over or compliment a generated piece with fully their own skill; and "experimenting using AI for a bit" does not mean "most" of their works are generated/assisted per your (or whoever's) flag reason. We shouldn't discredit an artist's entire works over the years because of recent dabbling with having AI assist but not fully create works.
I do appreciate their transparency and your findings though. Not many artists are willing to admit unfortunately.
what's the difference between assisted and generated? most of the people abusing ai to scam people out of their money cannot draw to begin with. having ai do 95% of the work is extremely unfair if you're trying to label yourself as an artist and never disclose the use of ai to your customers. also, i didn't pay for this. i reached out to a more knowledgeable forum and someone there was able to retrieve this from a few months back. but i appreciate you talking down at me because im persistent.
no one should have a platform or audience if theyre using ai. i know this is going to be hard to understand if you cant make art yourself but this is pretty shitty for skilled artists to have to put up with.