asset #25829745
Just to be sure
Posted under General
asset #25829745
Just to be sure
post #9308981 There's a lot of blurry elements, and these lines don't feel right.
artist #536449 could be ai, resolution matches.
john_the_elysialover said:
artist #536449 could be ai, resolution matches.
99% sure it is. Their pixiv page has everything uploaded within days of each other and all of it is 832x1216. Not to mention it all has the generic AI look with muddy details and nonsense backgrounds.
worldendDominator said:
Cinnamon_Toast said:
post #9262462
Their twitter username is literally 37bannAI. Come on now.
But judging purely by the post, what signifies it's ai? Fingers and hair looks fine. Where should I look for clues?
Updated by minnazzo
https://x.com/semicolonize/status/1922770839616843892 I really don't think that it is Ai generated but i'm not 100% sure
post #8796451 The galleries of the artist seem a bit too consistent.
post #9317378
Please tag or refute ☻
ion288 said:
post #9317378
Please tag or refute ☻
That doesn't look AI, most of that artist's stuff just look like artist mistakes. There's a few sus posts but most are human-looking enough, so I'm thinking it might be someone who also posted ai-assisted stuff at some point and all of their posts ended up with ai-generated as a result.
Their twitter timeline also shows a consistent artstyle with some improvements.
post #9287763
The account posts AI-generated works, they are being flagged as one on twitter.
post #9326157
90% sure this is AI-gen, as everything else from this "artist" is.
I am pretty sure this artist is creating their images with AI. I checked the source on Twitter, and the artist is uploading images at an abnormal speed; not to mention, there are obvious AI-generated images uploaded there.
InsomniacTwin said:
I am pretty sure this artist is creating their images with AI. I checked the source on Twitter, and the artist is uploading images at an abnormal speed; not to mention, there are obvious AI-generated images uploaded there.
post #9330625 Position of Nagatoro seems irrational if she just woke up.
baconmeh2 said:
post #9330625 Position of Nagatoro seems irrational if she just woke up.
Twitter's bio of the artist profile says in Japanese 完全な本物の芸術家ではないが.
«Not a complete real artist» is the result after translating it with Google Translator. Perhaps their images are only AI-assisted?
artist #339510 is currently having a Twitter meltdown and admits to tracing AI. Sad to see. https://x.com/AUSTSUE_re/status/1919557206800007561 for their confession and apology
According to the discussion at post #9332794, they seem to use AI to some degree.