The 2 characters seem to have 5-6 arms/hands for their pose which does not make sense, and there are some other aligning issues with drawing lines. I don’t know if the art is AI-assisted or fully artificial. Thank you.
Or might be just an error, knowing that is 2 year old post before Ai art starts becoming populer
post #6719290 I don't know what's this flagger's problem. How should this one be the only one scrutinized when every other work from this artist gets a pass?
post #6719290 I don't know what's this flagger's problem. How should this one be the only one scrutinized when every other work from this artist gets a pass?
I flagged this. The "artist" can't even fix breastcollarbone thing. If other works get a pass that means that "artist" can not to "draw" anymore? Just prompt and go? I know "hive" is not that much of correct detector but it gives this "art" 99.4% of AI. Idk what's YOUR problem if you can't see things.
post #6719290 I don't know what's this flagger's problem. How should this one be the only one scrutinized when every other work from this artist gets a pass?
Looking the others posts under this artist, almost all of them seem majority if not compeltely AI, with very little human input apart from maybe upscaling and a few really basic brushstrokes.
post #6719290 I don't know what's this flagger's problem. How should this one be the only one scrutinized when every other work from this artist gets a pass?
Looking at the artist's pixiv arts, I believe it's a case for the artist pivoting into ai-assisted drawing and then gradually embracing ai-gen arts instead. Ironically, most of the artist's prior works before that are not upped into danbo.
post #6719290 I don't know what's this flagger's problem. How should this one be the only one scrutinized when every other work from this artist gets a pass?
Most of their posts look obviously AI generated to me, it's kinda crazy how long has this user's works been uploaded simply because it comes with AI-assisted tag. It almost seems like they can't even draw proper lines nor basic shading, let alone achieved such level of details in a span of 2 months (comparing to before they started using ai).
Artist was borderline inactive for a while, posted a bunch of tagged AI art (pixiv #108489689), followed by a lot of stuff that still has a very AI look to it. I believe there's definitely AI involved, but I'm unsure to what degree.
post #6726337 only the parent is flagged and the flagger seems to be grasping at straws here. post #6647240 can this not be chalked up to error? where's the proof that it's fully generated? post #6655705 is deemed to be assisted, which this flagger needs to be reminded is allowed.
i believe all of them deserve ai-assisted... although i don't deny their art skill might have been somewhat improved after the long absence and i actually couldn't find anything obviously broken in those stuff above, even considering my own inconsistency on my art style, i still don't think it can excuse all of how inconsistent their recent art style is in a short period like 1 or 2 weeks between each stuff seeing them above, as comparison to its consistency seen in their old arts before the long absence.
I haven't been posting any of this artist's work because of my gut feeling that it's at least ai-assisted, but I'd like to ask for some other opinions.
If there are any surefire indicators of AI I'm overlooking them (I admit to not being very good at spotting AI art), but the detail level of their art jumped prodigiously between October 2022 (the first 4 pixiv posts) and December 2022, and there are odd variations in art and shading/coloring style between pictures. Anyone see a smoking gun anywhere?