Posted under General
the post #6578253 looks good, its quality is good, there is no reason to delete it, it has been reviewed several times and no one has given reasons for its approval, someone criticized the quality but the quality is high, so I really don't understand.
FSeventhC said:
the post #6578253 looks good, its quality is good, there is no reason to delete it, it has been reviewed several times and no one has given reasons for its approval, someone criticized the quality but the quality is high, so I really don't understand.
Approver's message says it, quality not about the raw dimensions or filesize beyond the bare minimum, otherwise anyone could just draw a stick figure on a white background and export it as a 10.000x10.000 px image and pretend it's worthy of being approved
Mayhem-Chan said:
Approver's message says it, quality not about the raw dimensions or filesize beyond the bare minimum, otherwise anyone could just draw a stick figure on a white background and export it as a 10.000x10.000 px image and pretend it's worthy of being approved
So what's the problem?, because I still can't see it.
Everything looks pretty good to me so tell me what you mean by quality.
Updated by FSeventhC
FSeventhC said:
So what's the problem?, because I still can't see it.
Everything looks pretty good to me so tell me what you mean by quality.
Not an approver either, but the anatomy, the shading, the background...I can see why it didn't get approved. That's what Mayhem means by quality, and this post just doesn't meet that.
Maiden_in_Orange said:
Not an approver either, but the anatomy, the shading, the background...I can see why it didn't get approved. That's what Mayhem means by quality, and this post just doesn't meet that.
Dude in this page there are many drawings of bad anatomy, simple shading and the background looks good too. The conditions here are very weird, you pass quite simple things, but when you don't approve something, you don't do it because it looks good or bad, but because it doesn't meet some kind of weird requirement or because you're looking for some reason not to. It doesn't matter that a drawing looks good because in the same way if or if you are looking for a reason not to approve it without giving it an apparent meaning.
Personally your responses were rude and none of you really point out the bad, you just spouted off pointless complaints. I am surprised that people who know absolutely nothing about art are judging what is good and what's not for the page, undoubtedly disappointing.
FSeventhC said:
.....
Please note, that Danbooru isn't an imageboard for artists to upload their own art. We have no problem with artists doing that, but the problem is, that most artist react very defensive, when their art is rejected. It's better to use art websites like Pixiv, DeviantArt or even Twitter.
Approvers have to approve good art that they like. Your upload has several problems, that are hard to point out, because there are many. Take the legs for example: there is no visible connection from the legs to the hip. No shading or anything else that points out the line between both legs. The face, like most of the image, is mostly flat, without any depth. And the problem I have with the image are the arms, which are appearing to short.
Last point: If you're asking for feedback, we're not obligated to give you any. Danbooru is a site run by volunteers for anything and if you're rude to other users, don't assume any help or tips in the future.
Posts seems to be in the same standard as other works uploaded by this artist so I don't know why this got rejected.
Why was this post #6602196 deleted
This post was noted by an approver to be pixely. This is something I noticed upon uploading from Twitter, but I'm still not sure how that happened. It could just be part of it's nature, for all I know. Does anyone know anything about that?
I think I might appeal this one, but this is something I would like to ask about first to see if I can fix. Alternatively, the approvers just don't like it for other reasons, in which case, ah well.
post #6605566 was deleted despite the quality being similiar with artist other works
Is it because hi fi rush not very popular here? I think the quality is above average or at least average when compared to most works on this site
Out of 7 uploaded pictures by Gulyás why were 4 approved, but not post #6608896 or post #6608896? It says 10-11 people reviewed them but they left no comments. I don't think the quality of these two is any significantly worse than the approved pictures.
Jemnite said:
Out of 7 uploaded pictures by Gulyás why were 4 approved, but not post #6608896 or post #6608896?
It doesn't matter if any other images of an artist were approved before. Images are judged individually by approvers, without comparing them to other images.
Looking to start upping furry art. Was wondering if anyone has advice on what type of furry art is most likely to get approved. Already aware of not uploading western art and stuff like that.
A few examples of art I thought of uploading:
https://twitter.com/pcsayshi/status/1457876334248488967
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/4904522
https://twitter.com/mochiri_work
Thanks.
Why is post #6609394 keep getting deleted? The artist other Mirko works got approved....
It got over 30+ upvotes, so i dont think its an issue of quality....
setyaputrabb said:
Why is post #6609394 keep getting deleted? The artist other Mirko works got approved....
It got over 30+ upvotes, so i dont think its an issue of quality....
Keep in mind that score has nothing to do with the post quality (for example post #6034067, it has 200+ score but with bad leg it didn't get approved).
Snarl said:
Keep in mind that score has nothing to do with the post quality (for example post #6034067, it has 200+ score but with bad leg it didn't get approved).
I see, unlike that example, i dont think the mirko art has any glaring errors though...
anon2anon2 said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/4904522
https://twitter.com/mochiri_workThanks.
I can see myself approving some of their works from what I've seen, especially mochiri, but that's just me.
setyaputrabb said:
Why is post #6609394 keep getting deleted? The artist other Mirko works got approved....
It got over 30+ upvotes, so i dont think its an issue of quality....
None of them went through the modqueue. Personally, not a big fan of her bottom half, her thighs look short.
post #6616094
post #6617743
post #6617748
post #6617755
Are any of these worth trying to appeal?
post #6581291
post #6581304
post #6615876
post #6615908
post #6615952
post #6615917
I can speculate that the first and fourth might be too long, and the first does look fairly sketchy, but no particular reason was given for any of them, so I'm at a loss.
