Wow, way to break two rules with one picture. And the rest of your post goes against point one of the general advice section of about:deletion appeals.
Also they're all pretty bad.
Edit: post #457491 is also a duplicate upload, as sgcdonmai points out in the comments.
I would like to appeal post #494400, I think it is rather skillfully drawn and there are many images of similar quality that have been approved on this site
Edit: I would also like to appeal post #494918, which is part of a series of three very similar images
Why doesn't anyone read the terms of service? Oh right, because everyone skips those things. Stupid "check if you agree" options on every program installer ever making us skip them. This is the relevant part:
Grotesque: Any depiction of extreme mutilation, extreme bodily distension, feces, or bodies that are far outside the realm of normal human proportion (for example, breasts or penises that are larger than two heads in size).
As to post #494667, as near as I can tell, it may be fairly high-detail, but is the sort of average artwork you'd expect from that particular breed of porn. It's also suffering from JPEG artifacts, a bit of bad scanning, and a general bias against approving yet another image like this. It's not very different from post #438448 though, so as a contributor upload it is probably borderline enough not to get deleted. I can't say it'll be undeleted, but it has a much better chance than the first one.
uncreative said: Why doesn't anyone read the terms of service? Oh right, because everyone skips those things. Stupid "check if you agree" options on every program installer ever making us skip them. This is the relevant part:
outcome doesn't really matter. like i've said before, if something catches my eye that hasnt been posted and isn't completely terrible, i'll post it. deletions are deletions. you move on.