Deletion appeal thread

mimeki said:
Appealing
post #435590
post #435592

No. CGs are hard to get approved as it is, and you expect us to approve character stills?

nevermind

Appealing this:
post #441391

The only possible reason I can see is that it might be poorly drawn, and it doesn't seem that way to me.

Can this be reconsidered please?
post #440482
I saw no reason for it to be deleted, it's rather cute and goes with the other K-on! pictures the artist drew.

Terrible art. Even Ritsu can't save art that bad.

Can post #441517 be reconsidered?

The pic looks cute, but I was thinking that the use of a photo as the background made Ushio and Nagisa a little off, which is why I think it was left unapproved. What do you think?

Its pretty bad. They don't mesh with the background at all, and they aren't drawn all that well to begin with.

Fencedude said:
Its pretty bad. They don't mesh with the background at all, and they aren't drawn all that well to begin with.

I agree; that's what I was thinking. I don't even see shadows under the two.

Fencedude said:
Terrible art. Even Ritsu can't save art that bad.

I think your over-exaggerating, it's just as nice as the other K-on solo set from the artist.

Most of that artist's stuff is pretty mediocre, but that Ritsu image is well below even that standard.

While the other +10 Sawao Uploads of mine got deleted too (unapproved), I ask to reconsider only
post #439742
post #439739
post #439740
post #439745

thanks.

post #442130

brownies?

.

NetoBochas said: I would say it's because the artifacts. I can be wrong though.

For me it would be the hideous bukkake, but the artifacts don't help.

bleh most koh's scans look the same, don't ask me why. Guess all of one person scanned his stuff and his scanner sucks. posts like
post #442128
and
post #396923
made me rage since I couldn't find any higher res anywhere. I wouldn't have posted any of the koh stuff if I thought there was higher res anywhere, just seems too good of an artist not to post. I understand though, I'm just a completionist.

By the way, you can use the post #xxxx shortcut where xxxx is the ID#. So that first link would be post #442128, for example.

Sorry knew there was a way but kept forgetting thanks.

post #441984

appealing it

Funny that immediately after being told how to to use the post #xxxx format, someone doesn't.

Tolone said:
bleh most koh's scans look the same, don't ask me why. Guess all of one person scanned his stuff and his scanner sucks.

Gah, those are all horribly awful. I want to delete them. Completeness or not, those artefacted horrors ain't do nobody no good.