post #3326298
post #3418319
post #3443474
post #3456203
post #3014507
post #2947346
post #2680478
post #2679476
also, for the completeness of its pool:
post #2594934
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #3326298
post #3418319
post #3443474
post #3456203
post #3014507
post #2947346
post #2680478
post #2679476
also, for the completeness of its pool:
post #2594934
the art piece was made for an artist know for drawing large breast, and the breast shown are much smaller.
Ordinarily these posts would have been approved in less than an hour, I don't know whats different about this time.
post #3458150
post #3458152
post #3458158
post #3458211
post #3458214
post #3458221
post #3458269
All parts of this manga series pool #14821. All fully translated comics. Doesn't make sense to have intermediate posts deleted. Thanks.
post #3459807
Please resconsider this one, the art has good quality and is consistent with other approved posts of the same artist.
post #3452658post #3454159 (Warning Shota)post #3454160 (Warning Shota)
Unsure what any of these are lacking in a technical sense.
Last two had very few approver leaving a judgement, would like some more eyes to give them a chance.
Updated
Squishy said:
post #3452658
post #3454159 (Warning Shota)
post #3454160 (Warning Shota)Unsure what any of these are lacking in a technical sense.
Last two had very few approver leaving a judgement, would like some more eyes to give them a chance.
You can approve this, can't you?
I'm only really opposed the the 4th and 1st post.
The 4th post has AWFUL legs as that is also mentioned in the comments and that is really rare to happen.
The first one has a squished body and the extra wide hips don't fit that body,tiny arms.
The shota one looks ok...it got missed because 1. shota and 2. explicit material.
I literally don't see why it wasn't approved.
post #3462546
post #3462520Can please look over these two again? I think they got only little attention, with the first only got 5 approvers looking over it
Updated
post #3434042post #3434051post #3434058
I believe these fall in line with other minimalistic/oekaki style works by this artist.
post #3432204 and child
A very nice and detailed work. Perhaps it was simply overlooked?
Updated
Please check this images once again.
Both are part of an ongoing weekly series with continuous approval, have been sourced from pixiv (unlike my first upload from the artist's twitter, which was deleted, fair enough) and were properly tagged. Please check again.