Megamet said:
Looks like a work in progress, the shading is only half done.
Posted under General
Megamet said:
Looks like a work in progress, the shading is only half done.
post #2355449
post #2354924 (part of series)
post #2354915
post #2356240
The first one has a perspective problem with Kamikaze's left leg and both her face and Harukaze's face don't look right. I'm guessing the second one has a head that doesn't seem to match the body it's paired up with. The third one's actually pretty good and I don't really have much to say about the fourth one other than unremarkable.
I need to know what's wrong with my uploads here:
post #2362195
post #2362191
post #2362188
Please check for this one. Thanks.
Hmm, this thread should only be used when you're trying to ask why multiple uploads were deleted.
If you want to have a second check on them, then this thread is appropriate: http://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_topics/8554?page=450
If they only had a few mods (around 2) expressing disinterest I would've just appealed them, but here I see no less than 5 mods expressing disinterest so now I'm compelled to ask why.
Fallen_Nightingale said:
If they only had a few mods (around 2) expressing disinterest I would've just appealed them, but here I see no less than 5 mods expressing disinterest so now I'm compelled to ask why.
I think it's how sketchy the lines look for the second one. It looks very much like a WIP, rather than a finished piece.
post #2385038 (I was thinking hips...?)
post #2372272
post #2366150
post #2360277
post #2357563
Mikumikudance
nanami said:
post #2385038 (I was thinking hips...?)
post #2372272
post #2366150
post #2360277
post #2357563
To me, these all seem passable, but maybe that's the problem? None of them are super great quality, merely nice.
Chimera99 said:
Mikumikudance
No comment on the Kantai one, but the two MMD ones... low quality CGI, regardless of humor or whatever, really doesn't belong here. As a rule of thumb, if it looks like it could have been pulled from a Playstation 1 or 2 game (like these), definitely steer away.
nanami said:
post #2385038 (I was thinking hips...?)
post #2372272
post #2366150
post #2360277
post #2357563
First one has a pretty odd looking face that looks off-center and while you may be right about the hips, I'm more worried about the arms. The second one has some pretty bad looking eyes and thighs that seem to be of different lengths. Don't have much to say about the third one other than really mediocre looking. The fourth one has a bad looking right hand and non-existent left hand. And I guess the fifth one seems passable. Emphasis on the "seems".
Chimera99 said:
Mikumikudance
The first one has a blocky ass. Actually, a lot of it looks like it lacks curves of any kind and her middle finger on her left hand looks like it's growing out of where her knuckles should. As for the MMDs, they just look bad. First one reminds me of those crappy Garry's Mod videos with the seizurific polygons and texture clipping.
post #2402300
post #2396417 (parent to post #2396417, which is a calendar image)
post #2390446
post #2385067
First one has a hip problem that makes her bottom half look much smaller compared to the rest of her body. As for the second one, what that image did is show off how generic it looked, which the calendar aesthetic hides. This is probably why a lot of approvers passed over it. The third one has a weirdly drawn face, poorly drawn arms and hands, and a torso that looks too small to be connected to those legs. The fourth one? I'm not exactly sure about it other than Harukaze's torso raising some questions.
@nanami
Well, I start from the top :
1. The first image has uneven eyes. Wouldn't be much of a problem, but the right hand also looks awfully suspicious, but the worst thing there is the right hip (with the face). Don't know how to say it in a good way, but it looks a bit dislocated.
2. The second one also has problems with the face. The eyes look as they were sticked on the face and are not part of it -> The artist missed some shading, especially on the head. Why the child was approved, though? Don't know. Maybe @Not_One_Of_Us has an answer.
3. The third one...bad anatomy in my eyes. The thighs are way too fat for her body which looks much slimmer compared to the legs, especially the thighs. But even if this weren't a problem: It's again the face here. Here right cheek isn't that good drawn and this gives the face a weird look. It's far from awful, but I'd struggle to approve it if it would only be the face.
And a third point on this pic is: The left leg, especially the part under the knee: I highly doubt that in this position, it's possible that the knee points in another direction than the foot.
4. The feet. They are very skinny. Looks like bad foreshortening, but it shouldn't be there. The feet are too small compared to the body. The torso and arms are finy, though.
And in my opinion, the left girl is worse than the right one. If only the right one would be visible, I might have approved this one, but the left girl also has something I personally don't like: It's this grin that ruins the face in my eyes. Of course this is subjective, though.
the left girl also has something I personally don't like: It's this grin that ruins the face in my eyes. Of course this is subjective, though.
Just to say, that's pretty much the same expression as she makes in her official damaged art as per post #2348805