It's not loli.
Posted under General
Randeel said:
No.
zeparoh said:
Since it's come hitherish I'd say yes.
zeparoh said:
I can't tell to be honest. I'm leaning towards no.
pcell said:
I'd say no since the face looks too old and not too big in relation to the rest of the body.
I've one as well and it wasn't me who added the tag so I'd say no but since it's one of my uploads, I'm in no position to judge this.
post #2225042
post #2272612 and post #2225042 aren't loli. They both look too old to be such.
Nude, lolified Ashigara, without any visible naughty bits. Seems completely innocent, but I tagged loli just to be safe.
NNescio said:
Nude, lolified Ashigara, without any visible naughty bits. Seems completely innocent, but I tagged loli just to be safe.
Completely non sexual, so no.
tapnek said:
Looks more like a chubby short woman to me. Not sure if it counts as loli though but I'm leaning towards no.
Schrobby said:
Completely non sexual, so no.
Provence said:
Yeah, I'm here with Schrobby and tapnek. The focus isn't the nudity so it isn't even sexual. That would even be a nude pic where a safe rating could be applied.
Alright then, thanks guys.