Not my post, though it seems nice enough to qualify... Or maybe I'm just blind.
Posted under General
Not my post, though it seems nice enough to qualify... Or maybe I'm just blind.
It's parent was accepted?
Tonny890 said:
It's parent was accepted?
The parent was also of a much higher resolution.
Is something wrong with the quality of this one?
KenjehXD said:
Is something wrong with the quality of this one?
I would hazard that it wasn't bad, but more towards mediocre. The quality is okay, but the composition is very boring and the image (imo) lacks charm. If it wasn't a bust shot, but rather a cowboy shot, I think it would've been a bit better.
Feedback on what's wrong with this one please.
post #1943828
What's the deal with the picture above? I uploaded it first and then someone uploads it aswell and it's exactly the same quality. Only a different source. And that makes mine not get approved?
Updated by Sythini
Sythini said:
The Pixiv version of this image was probably chosen over the Twitter version because the JPEG artifacts are a little more noticeable on the Twitter version. Personally, I try to avoid uploading JPGs from Twitter because Twitter seems to automatically lower picture quality after the artist posts in order to save space. (For various technical reasons, this problem doesn't affect PNG files.)
Just curious to see what was wrong with these so I can avoid posting like kind in the future.
Tonny890 said:
post #1936356
post #1936357
post #1936357
post #1936358
post #1936360
post #1936361
Low quality ero, currently even cheap H-games tend to have better art inside
Elfaleon said:
Just curious to see what was wrong with these so I can avoid posting like kind in the future.
First one is kinda plain and not interesting.
Second is.. ok for me. Similar, already accepted arts done by the same author seem to confirm it.
Unfortunately none of mods support that notion... though the question is how many mods exactly did decide here against it and by how many of them it was simply overlooked (which happens often than one would like to admit)
Anyway, I suggest an appeal.
Wondering why this post didn't get approved...
post #2019381
post #2021240
post #1977705
post #1841144
post #1731444
this post #1730758 and it's child post...
post #1730017
post #1664845
post #1598790
post #1573347
post #1561837
this post #1482397 and it's child post...
tch, I had more good uploaded images that didn't get approved... I need a very good explanation.
T34/38 said:
...
A very good explanation is that a lot of those are mediocre, and some are just bad. They don't use a wide range of tones, which would be fine if their form were good to make up for it. Like in that wehrmacht image post #1977705, the stark contrast between the shaded and textured shirt and the practically single-tone skin really stands out in a bad way.
Or that arashio post #1573347, where the navel takes up the whole abdomen and is just totally weird.
I really don't get why this is deleted.
Megamet said:
I really don't get why this is deleted.
I'd say the part of the image where she sits on that blurry something (is that supposed to be a rock? why out of focus?) is quite shaky, both the part she sits on and the part where her legs are cut off. Compare it to post #1362306 or post #1680915 or post #1912178, for example.
Megamet said:
I really don't get why this is deleted.
the ass gets kind of really weird.
Not really seeing why these are deleted. I've posted artwork of similar quality before and they went through just fine. Does it have something to do with the artist name?
They're both below average, technically. On the first image, instead of drawing folds on the clothes, they shadow them on willy nilly. It wouldn't be a problem if the folds were in the middle, but they're on the side and originating from nowhere.
On the second, it's bad coloring. The huge difference in gradient on the hug pillow makes it look like it's glowing, as well as a myriad of minor problems such as the strap positioning of her camisole, the elbow lines going straight around the whole arm on both sides, a complete lack of knowledge on cast and form shadows, and which one is hard and which one is soft, etc etc.
Edit: On further examination, in image 1, it appears that though the sunlight is coming from the above-front, the back of her hair facing her back is still lit up, showing that the artist doesn't understand lighting, either.
Part of a Monogatari-Pokemon series. Others are:
post #2056223
post #2065895
post #2065898
post #2065903 (this one currently in the queue)