I dont know if theres a rule about it, but keep Yukkuri's stuff on yukkuri.shii.org/ unless they just making cameos imo

Yukkuri works are fine if they are of good quality.

A lot of what is accepted at OYP will not be accepted here, and I doubt that this will be an exception, a lot of people don't like z-aki or gesuaki's work.

Z-aki's "art" makes me want to punch babies.
Please, think of the babies.

Heparine said:
Z-aki's "art" makes me want to punch babies.
Please, think of the babies.

He specifically designed his art to "induce anger" or something. Not that its good art, but it does what its supposed to. The only artist that deals with this type of art and makes it half-way decent, artwise, is kirata but his stories tend to get lost in these bizarre justifications for the premise of yukkuris and abusing them that they meander.

I doubt even he would make it on danbooru because of the nature of the content, but he probably has the best chance.

Guro are accept, so why not yukkuri?

potatotomato said:
Guro are accept, so why not yukkuri?

That is an old discussion and it basically amounts to the art being generally poor.

Guro is against the TOS but guro works that are accepted are not vulgar, have good art, or are part of a story that redeems it.

That and the fact most of the yukkuri-abuse community and stories are just not likable.

potatotomato said:
Guro are accept, so why not yukkuri?

What? Guro without redeeming qualities is against ToS and warrants deletion. There's nothing about yukkuri in the ToS, this is just shitty art, yukkuri or not. Learn the difference.

potatotomato said:
Guro are accept, so why not yukkuri?

Don't start this argument again. Just please stop uploading shit quality yukkuri or you'll be given a neg record.

Anelaid said:
That is an old discussion and it basically amounts to the art being generally poor.

Guro is against the TOS but guro works that are accepted are not vulgar, have good art, or are part of a story that redeems it.

That and the fact most of the yukkuri-abuse community and stories are just not likable.

Ok

Anelaid said:
The only artist that deals with this type of art and makes it half-way decent, artwise, is kirata but his stories tend to get lost in these bizarre justifications for the premise of yukkuris and abusing them that they meander.

I doubt even he would make it on danbooru because of the nature of the content, but he probably has the best chance.

None of Kiriraitaa's works that were posted on Danbo have survived the queue, and all of it was free of any of the typical "abyuse" you would expect.