I should have added this earlier to this post too, but comment #2596587. TLDR: some people think the situation is inconsistent with how it would realistically be handled under British law.
The weird thing was I was actually thinking "what if the images she got in trouble for were actually worse and she's just using lolicon as a smokescreen?" yesterday. But I'm still skeptical since it would make it even more inconsistent with what was being said about British law.
Also, the claim about Stephanie from LazyTown seems to be a bit of a stretch to me. I mean, it is true she was played by two minors, but are the people drawing porn of the character really thinking about that? I doubt they're trying to portray the actresses in any way, especially with the loli stuff.
This has become more infuriating for the UK government, I mean if its the possession of CP, sure she deserved to be locked up, but why on earth does the government has to say that she got arrested because of drawings.
If the source is KF which are more often than not faking shit to target someone they just hate (like this guy Chibi reviews) while at the same time covering for their groomer leader (Shaun) then I'd demand more solid proof, the real cp adjacent is disgusting and reminds me of Shadman drama. Btw the accusations against Mimi started as an attack to Chibi lol.
Leave a comment