Should we tag all this artist's stuff ai-generated or ai-assisted after their... strange... twitter rant?

https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1952856715931660789

In the comments they claim not to be, but I can't parse the intent of what they said. Or why they're mad.

02993 said:

Should we tag all this artist's stuff ai-generated or ai-assisted after their... strange... twitter rant?

https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1952856715931660789

In the comments they claim not to be, but I can't parse the intent of what they said. Or why they're mad.

preview (preview0) can draw really well actually, it's just that evidently they've been using ai on their work, and their response to the backlash sounds like something an ai artist would say. Someone who has nothing to hide wouldn't be so butthurt over this.

Myth-of-Stars said:

preview (preview0) can draw really well actually, it's just that evidently they've been using ai on their work, and their response to the backlash sounds like something an ai artist would say. Someone who has nothing to hide wouldn't be so butthurt over this.

she is replying to a korean netizen that she is not using AI but she just want to call out those who accuse her using AI. to me, she actually using AI art up until the stage of pose and reference. but looking at the art in this post, you can see the lineart around the arm with number on it. why would human artist let something like tumor growing on her arm like that?

This one is also ai-assisted. The left cup of the bikini looks absurdly padded and the right ear seems to fuse with her hair.

I also think all of Preview's stuff should be tagged as ai-assisted. I've browsed what has been posted here when they got called out a few days ago and most of their stuff after 2022 looks at best suspicious when it's not obviously ai-assisted (especially the commissioned illustrations).

02993 said:

Should we tag all this artist's stuff ai-generated or ai-assisted after their... strange... twitter rant?

https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1952856715931660789

In the comments they claim not to be, but I can't parse the intent of what they said. Or why they're mad.

People get mad when they get exposed lol that's why.

I'm not sure if tagging all pictures by him ai assisted or generated is a good idea considering he used to make art without ai, but we should tag stuff that gets posted from now on as ai generated definitely.

This person is ass and their content is AI please ban

02993 said:

https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1952856715931660789

Twitter said:

Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age. Learn more

I see the Musk Rat either skipped school, or South African education is as terrible as American one, but I'm not living in the UK so I shouldn't be subjected to Big Brother's retarded laws.

Yeah this dude stuff is fully AI, this is not even assist.

stene said:

Yeah this dude stuff is fully AI, this is not even assist.

I've seen this exact pose before as well, but I can't remember where, not a similar pose, the exact pose and proportions, if not AI, I feel it could be a partial trace.

[deleted]

ducklover said:

I've seen this exact pose before as well, but I can't remember where, not a similar pose, the exact pose and proportions, if not AI, I feel it could be a partial trace.

You don't have to trace. you can use img to img or generate a seed to generate a similar overlay of another image.

02993 said in comment #2536372:

Should we tag all this artist's stuff ai-generated or ai-assisted after their... strange... twitter rant?

https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1952856715931660789

In the comments they claim not to be, but I can't parse the intent of what they said. Or why they're mad.

Yes,His works should carry an AI-generated tag.
He's just a shameless scammer.