This about the recent removal of some adult content from Steam and the complete de-indexing/removal of adult NSFW content from Itch.io?

GreyOmega said:

This about the recent removal of some adult content from Steam and the complete de-indexing/removal of adult NSFW content from Itch.io?

Yeah.

The fun part is the group who initiated it, Collective Shout, is a Australian fundamentalist conservative Christian group using feminism as a cudgel to ban pornographic works, which includes LGBTQ+ works. You can really cherrypick/conveniently ignore any part and craft a narrative supporting any viewpoint you want.

They wrote an article calling Cuties a brilliant social commentary and overall good movie though. So once again, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

Hthy said:

The fun part is the group who initiated it, Collective Shout, is a Australian fundamentalist conservative Christian group using feminism as a cudgel to ban pornographic works, which includes LGBTQ+ works. You can really cherrypick/conveniently ignore any part and craft a narrative supporting any viewpoint you want.

They wrote an article calling Cuties a brilliant social commentary and overall good movie though. So once again, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

blindVigil said:

Yeah.

Folks were quick to call them out on their hypocrisy. So much so that one Japanese politician got involved. The backlash they've got was so severe, they locked their Twitter account. And anyone that was following them, was blocked.

Hthy said:

They wrote an article calling Cuties a brilliant social commentary and overall good movie though. So once again, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

hate to be the devil's advocate but has literally anybody here ever watched cuties or is this like, the new version of GTA where people don't watch it but say it's bad

I dont understand, is this post saying lolicons were correct on something?

Nickle_Cradle_Colorado said:

I dont understand, is this post saying lolicons were correct on something?

basically anyone that get offended on a ficitional art of a "child looking" art and screams this, that whatever is a CLOSET PEDOPHILE. Also hyprocrite.

I think I saw that news a lot.

TheGreens said:

hate to be the devil's advocate but has literally anybody here ever watched cuties or is this like, the new version of GTA where people don't watch it but say it's bad

I don’t need to watch a movie that sexualized hundreds of real life underage girls looking for the "right" girls to sexualize to decide that a movie that sexualizes real life minors to tell the very obvious message "sexualizing real life underage girls is bad" is a deplorable, hypocritical movie.

Why the fuck would I watch such a disgusting movie just to reach a conclusion that didn't require watching it?

Nickle_Cradle_Colorado said:

I dont understand, is this post saying lolicons were correct on something?

For the last decade, loli content has been on the "frontlines" of the censorship war. It's always the easiest thing to target because no one is willing to defend it. Lolicons have been saying for years that it wouldn't stop at loli/shota content, and now surprise surprise, it hasn't stopped at loli/shota content.

This is literally mentioned in the commentary, btw.

blindVigil said:

I'm never gonna watch cuties, but it's not cause I know anything about it. It's cause if I do, people will say I'm weird, and I don't like being called weird. its insecurity. I think a lot of people are more insecure than they'd admit.

You do need to watch something before judging it, end of story. if it was actually pornographic, it would be taken down. There's no such thing as "noble ignorance". That's what the pro-censorship crowd is advocating for. "I'm too good to empathize."

And yes the lolicons were right all along but I was saying that with them for years, it was obvious.

TheGreens said:

You do need to watch something before judging it, end of story. if it was actually pornographic, it would be taken down. There's no such thing as "noble ignorance". That's what the pro-censorship crowd is advocating for. "I'm too good to empathize."

I don’t need to watch a movie that did exactly what it was supposedly criticizing to judge it, end of story. I know what's in the movie, I know what went into making the movie. I gain nothing by watching it. It was not necessary to sexualize real children to tell its message. Anyone who defends Cuties has zero integrity and their opinions are worthless, especially if those opinions are, "sexualizing women in media is bad."

"First they came for the lolicons, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a lolicon.
Then they came for the smut lovers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a smut lover.
Then they came for the gamers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a gamer.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me."

Maybe a little dramatic, but eventually, censorship WILL go too far. There are people out there who are dismissing the protesters as "porn addicts". Sooner or later, they'll eat crow when they discover they can't watch Sailor Moon or the original animated Little Mermaid because of "depictions of underage nudity".

CrystalLeaf said:

"First they came for the lolicons, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a lolicon.
Then they came for the smut lovers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a smut lover.
Then they came for the gamers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a gamer.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me."

Maybe a little dramatic, but eventually, censorship WILL go too far. There are people out there who are dismissing the protesters as "porn addicts". Sooner or later, they'll eat crow when they discover they can't watch Sailor Moon or the original animated Little Mermaid because of "depictions of underage nudity".

Streets are saying they pulled Mouthwashing from Itch too, even though a) it has no explicit scenes and b) the only sex in the story is all but stated to have actually been rape. So not even a week in and this is already extending well beyond what any sane person would consider porn, let alone CP.

alphashitlord said:

Streets are saying they pulled Mouthwashing from Itch too, even though a) it has no explicit scenes and b) the only sex in the story is all but stated to have actually been rape. So not even a week in and this is already extending well beyond what any sane person would consider porn, let alone CP.

It seems it was the developers themselves that pulled it (they removed the files, but they still have a download button linking to their Steam page), and that was in 2024. Consequently, the page was also de-indexed at that time, but the actual page is still up. It’s just not available in searches because it doesn’t meet the criteria for getting indexed.
https://kasuraga.itch.io/mouthwashing

More context here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1mbjxfh/comment/n5mojre/

[deleted]

Lol the lies about collective shout are so funny of course the pedophiles are upset yeah side with ten guy who makes sexualized art of kids and we're the bad guys lmao

[deleted]

[deleted]

If pedophiles were the first line of defense then I hope they break it

Fhikfyin said:

Lol the lies about collective shout are so funny of course the pedophiles are upset yeah side with ten guy who makes sexualized art of kids and we're the bad guys lmao

Fhikfyin said:

If pedophiles were the first line of defense then I hope they break it

You have a 13-year-old girl in nothing but her underwear in your favorites (post #7426390).