Fem-Bridget deniers be like: "yep, that's a man"

Oh_My said:

Fem-Bridget deniers be like: "yep, that's a man"

Femboy-bridget deniers be like: "men can't be feminine"

it would forever be very funny to me that ALL men have a genetically encoded boob size, and unless they take estrogen and transition, they're never going to find out :3

There will be still those who find that to be attractive either way...including me.

Don't know why people keep changing the tags on this. Does not matter whether you think Bridget is a girl or a boy, doesn't even matter if you want to listen to the literal creators and devs as to the character, simply following Tag What You See should make this very simple.

cranberrie said:

Don't know why people keep changing the tags on this. Does not matter whether you think Bridget is a girl or a boy, doesn't even matter if you want to listen to the literal creators and devs as to the character, simply following Tag What You See should make this very simple.

See topic #27603. I would recommend discussing it there instead of editing these without discussion. A user has already been banned for doing this to several posts.

Also, from forum #346319:

zetsubousensei said:

I would say the children should give context, but that would make this breast padding not male_with_breasts.

I agree with this. If male with breasts and breast padding are mutually exclusive, then we should not be using the former at all for this post. Either we go with strict TWYS and tag this 1girl, or we take the child post into account and tag this 1boy and breast padding. Whatever happens with this post, let's at least keep the internal logic consistent.

Blank_User said:

See topic #27603. I would recommend discussing it there instead of editing these without discussion. A user has already been banned for doing this to several posts.

Also, from forum #346319:

I agree with this. If male with breasts and breast padding are mutually exclusive, then we should not be using the former at all for this post. Either we go with strict TWYS and tag this 1girl, or we take the child post into account and tag this 1boy and breast padding. Whatever happens with this post, let's at least keep the internal logic consistent.

I'll check it out, thanks.

On their fanbox the boobs weren't fake but the artist also likes to draw Bridget as a male with breasts. With that said there's no evidence that this Bridget is a boy and the artist didn't tag it as otokonoko on the fanbox but post #8895593 on fanbox had a penis and was also labeled as otokonoko. Knowledge comes from locked content so I don't know if it even factors into how we tag.

This is why you're supposed to tag what you see and not insert interpretations based on knowledge you have or think you have. It doesn't matter if the breasts are actually real or balloons nor does matter what the artist says if it contradicts what you're presented with. What matters is what's visible in the image itself and that's the correct way to tag.