This work is ai assisted, it should be tagged as ai.

I honestly thought the top left corner Cream had a cameltoe but no, it's the intersected outlines.

Darthmobian said:

This work is ai assisted, it should be tagged as ai.

Is this also AI?

wonklegoosegus said:

Is this also AI?

I really don't understand how a timelapse of a completely different image is supposed to prove this image isn't AI or that the artist has never used AI. All this proves is that they have some decent skill, but being skilled at something doesn't mean someone wouldn't cheat.

Like, you guys are some of the most gullible people I've ever seen. "B-but it says "Not AI" in their bio!" Yeah like no one's ever lied on the internet before. The artist obviously used AI in post #8759675, and there's no real reason to think they wouldn't use it in other works.

blindVigil said:

I really don't understand how a timelapse of a completely different image is supposed to prove this image isn't AI or that the artist has never used AI. All this proves is that they have some decent skill, but being skilled at something doesn't mean someone wouldn't cheat.

Like, you guys are some of the most gullible people I've ever seen. "B-but it says "Not AI" in their bio!" Yeah like no one's ever lied on the internet before. The artist obviously used AI in post #8759675, and there's no real reason to think they wouldn't use it in other works.

Then people are honestly better off picking the images that are known to be AI instead of potentially crying wolf. It’s really just Innocent Until Proven Guilty imo

I changed the rating back to general and removed the cameltoe and loli tags, because the top-left Cream doesn't have a cameltoe, that's just the tail outline intersecting with the body outline.

I'm not used to having to scrutinize stylized anthro art like this, so I didn't think much about the possibility of AI use when uploading this. I've now added the ai-assisted tag, because some of the usual tells are there (e.g. the lines being warped in a specific way). There's also some evidence that the artist is at least using AI images as a base for tracing or img2img generation. However, I'm not doubting the artist's ability to draw. They shared some old sketches that look organic to me.

lIlIllIIIllIIIIIlIlIllIl said:

I changed the rating back to general and removed the cameltoe and loli tags, because the top-left Cream doesn't have a cameltoe, that's just the tail outline intersecting with the body outline.

I don't think tagging this loli is necessary, and you're correct about the "cameltoe," but the upper-left outfit is a bit too revealing for G, especially for someone her age. You can even see her groin on both sides.

wonklegoosegus said:

Is this also AI?

Notice how what you posted is now deleted?