Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ghostybutt 6

Copyrights

  • ? guilty gear 20k
  • ? ↳ guilty gear strive 9.0k

Character

  • ? bridget (guilty gear) 3.8k

General

  • ? 1boy 1.7M
  • ? androgyne symbol 1.7k
  • ? aqua eyes 204k
  • ? aqua gloves 2.0k
  • ? bike shorts under skirt 7.1k
  • ? blonde hair 1.8M
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? boots 571k
  • ? bulge 38k
  • ? fingerless gloves 300k
  • ? gloves 1.6M
  • ? heart 683k
  • ? hood 347k
  • ? hood up 59k
  • ? hooded jacket 71k
  • ? hoodie 155k
  • ? jacket 1.1M
  • ? lgbt pride 724
  • ? long sleeves 1.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? medium hair 464k
  • ? open clothes 581k
  • ? open hoodie 8.9k
  • ? parted lips 577k
  • ? puffy long sleeves 73k
  • ? puffy sleeves 409k
  • ? simple background 2.1M
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? transgender flag 372
  • ? trap 63k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 214k
  • ? commentary 1.7M
  • ? english commentary 601k
  • ? highres 6.2M

Information

  • ID: 6362204
  • Uploader: KotokoIwanaga »
  • Date: about 2 years ago
  • Size: 192 KB .jpg (1758x2048) »
  • Source: twitter.com/ghostybutt/status/1664328049775755264 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 41
  • Favorites: 58
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #6362200
Resized to 48% of original (view original)
bridget (guilty gear and 1 more) drawn by ghostybutt

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • happy pride month with bridget 🩷🩵🤍 #guiltygear #GGST

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    UnlimitedShirouWorks
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    -3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    UnlimitedShirouWorks said:

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    Danbooru will always go by visuals because this is a website dedicated to keeping track of visual depictions rather than a lore wiki.
    Bridget will always be written as boy until visually depicted as anything other regardless of canon lore status.

    -14 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Incineration
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    CitrusC said:

    Danbooru will always go by visuals because this is a website dedicated to keeping track of visual depictions rather than a lore wiki.

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    -11 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Incineration said:

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    What do you mean? We've never tagged Bridget as a girl before Strive, unless it was a confirmed genderswap. Just because people drew her with a girly appearance, which was part of her official design, doesn't mean it wasn't always understood by fans that she was a boy. What, should everyone have been drawing her muscular and manish just because she was canonically male?

    The only thing that's even changed is how she identifies, and she probably doesn't care nearly as much as the people constantly complaining about how she's tagged on a random image aggregator website that most of the userbase just uses to find porn.

    -3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Incineration said:

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    Bridget was not depicted as a girl until Strive where she declared to be trans. Even then, due to consistency and disregarding of lore, Bridget is tagged as boy.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    PikaFan15
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    UnlimitedShirouWorks said:

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    -16 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ElMachine
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    PikaFan15 said:

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    People are hating when you are right, the policy is lacking and creates too much confusion.
    The ability to look up characters by their identity is as negligible to a site's tagging as any other identifier like fantasy races and alternative outfits.
    E621 has more issues but I look at Philomena and Furbooru and Derpibooru tagging standards as incredible.

    7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    WhatWillYouDoWithoutMeOp
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    ElMachine said:

    People are hating when you are right, the policy is lacking and creates too much confusion.
    The ability to look up characters by their identity is as negligible to a site's tagging as any other identifier like fantasy races and alternative outfits.
    E621 has more issues but I look at Philomena and Furbooru and Derpibooru tagging standards as incredible.

    People are probably hating because the comment was unnecessarily vitriolic.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Discord96
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    PikaFan15 said:

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    Lore is established, not declared

    -9 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    gratman
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Please stop mistagging this post. There is visible bulge.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    lunanova
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    gratman said:

    Please stop mistagging this post. There is visible bulge.

    Please refresh your memory on Danbooru's stance on tagging Bridget's gender. If it's explicitly stated that she's a trans girl, then it's 1girl. The trans flag seems pretty damn explicit to me.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    nonamethanks
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    lunanova said:

    Please refresh your memory on Danbooru's stance on tagging Bridget's gender. If it's explicitly stated that she's a trans girl, then it's 1girl. The trans flag seems pretty damn explicit to me.

    Wrong. That only applies to rating:g. In this post there's a visible dick.

    Updated by nonamethanks almost 2 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    verifiably
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    nonamethanks said:

    Wrong. That only applies to rating:g. In this post there's a visible dick.

    Where's this stated?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    verifiably said:

    Where's this stated?

    forum #222668

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    helljumperhelljumper
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    WhatWillYouDoWithoutMeOp said:

    People are probably hating because the comment was unnecessarily vitriolic.

    Not unnecessarily

    -8 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /