Why is this character being tagged as 1other? They have tits so it's obviously a girl no matter what fate says.

Unbreakable said:

Why is this character being tagged as 1other? They have tits so it's obviously a girl no matter that fate says.

This is getting ridiculous. Look at the breasts and hips on post #4923783. Some users are so determined to tag gender based on canon that nothing short of a vagina will convince them to tag a girl as 1girl.

iridescent_slime said:

This is getting ridiculous. Look at the breasts and hips on post #4923783. Some users are so determined to tag gender based on canon that nothing short of a vagina will convince them to tag a girl as 1girl.

Just like Chevalier d'Eon or Enkidu, I think this character should be tagged 1other (unless visibly one or the other.) A visible indication like breasts etc should obviously lead to 1girl like we do for those characters, but if there's no real indication of gender such as flat chest and so on, it should be 1other, for example post #4921956 post #4925903 or post #4926762

If a character is drawn with the simplest of a sex's characteristics, it doesn't matter what the official site says.

Because if you take that logic further to always tag canon sex, stuff like genderswap doesn't exist.

iridescent_slime said:

Some users are so determined to tag gender based on canon that nothing short of a vagina will convince them to tag a girl as 1girl.

Not even that. post #4855264 was tagged as 1other until I pointed it out (now why was I negativated for pointing it out, I'll never know).

Funnily enough, ROMA has just 1 image with the 1other tag, and it's most likely because Enkidu is also there.

Astolfo said:

Just like Chevalier d'Eon or Enkidu, I think this character should be tagged 1other (unless visibly one or the other.) A visible indication like breasts etc should obviously lead to 1girl like we do for those characters, but if there's no real indication of gender such as flat chest and so on, it should be 1other, for example post #4921956 post #4925903 or post #4926762

That's a perfectly reasonable perspective on the matter. My complaint was addressed specifically towards this and other posts where they have an obviously female body shape; I have no qualms with tagging them 1other when they're drawn with an androgynous figure.

Ghost_H said:

Not even that. post #4855264 was tagged as 1other until I pointed it out (now why was I negativated for pointing it out, I'll never know).

Wow. Just, fucking wow.

[deleted]

Provence said:

If a character is drawn with the simplest of a sex's characteristics, it doesn't matter what the official site says.

Because if you take that logic further to always tag canon sex, stuff like genderswap doesn't exist.

This. The unknown gender thing is mostly an in-joke in Fate/Grand Order anyway. In the story, the "original/historically accurate" Ranmaru says that no matter how he looks at Mysterious Ranmaru X, he sees a girl. "She" doesn't deny it, but replies that her gender must remain a mystery.