On one hand, yes, it looks like a futanari and the source is tagged as futanari, but on the other hand it could be just a way to get more visibility considering HUQU has made several times comics showing t-dolls and humans using ultra highly advanced strap-ons, so i ended up leaning more towards this interpretation.

FeyrisHun said:

On one hand, yes, it looks like a futanari and the source is tagged as futanari, but on the other hand it could be just a way to get more visibility considering HUQU has made several times comics showing t-dolls and humans using ultra highly advanced strap-ons, so i ended up leaning more towards this interpretation.

If it doesn't look like a strap-on, it shouldn't be tagged as one

blindVigil said:

If it doesn't look like a strap-on, it shouldn't be tagged as one

Alright, but just to be sure, post #4427775 and post #4427793 would count as strap-on because it's shown it can be remove while this one don't, right?

Edit: I mean, sure it doesn't look like a strap-on, but still could be technically considering post #4457420 and others works by the artist where these characters usually have vaginas or are using different types of dildos for the strap-on.

Huqu viewers (context) = Strap-on
First time viewers = Futanari

Overtale said:

Huqu viewers (context) = Strap-on
First time viewers = Futanari

It can't be a " Strap-on " If it doesn't strap-on to their waists. Tagging it futanari would be more accurate.