Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? coralus 17

Copyright

  • ? wendy's 341

Character

  • ? wendy (wendy's) 280

General

  • ? 1girl 7.9M
  • ? animification 28k
  • ? antenna hair 118k
  • ? artist name 576k
  • ? blue bow 167k
  • ? blue gem 26k
  • ? bow 1.6M
  • ? braid 869k
  • ? breasts 4.7M
  • ? brooch 87k
  • ? closed mouth 1.8M
  • ? copyright name 170k
  • ? doyagao 3.2k
  • ? finger to mouth 49k
  • ? fingernails 256k
  • ? freckles 58k
  • ? frilled sleeves 113k
  • ? frills 716k
  • ? gem 108k
  • ? hair bow 710k
  • ? hand on own face 68k
  • ? jewelry 1.5M
  • ? long fingernails 51k
  • ? long hair 5.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.6M
  • ? medium breasts 1.2M
  • ? nail polish 324k
  • ? orange background 41k
  • ? puffy short sleeves 243k
  • ? puffy sleeves 492k
  • ? red eyes 1.7M
  • ? red hair 696k
  • ? shirt 2.7M
  • ? short sleeves 853k
  • ? simple background 2.7M
  • ? smile 3.9M
  • ? smug 32k
  • ? solo 6.6M
  • ? striped clothes 338k
  • ? striped shirt 48k
  • ? tsurime 61k
  • ? twin braids 235k
  • ? twintails 1.2M
  • ? upper body 1.1M
  • ? vertical-striped clothes 60k
  • ? vertical-striped shirt 12k
  • ? white nails 6.0k

Meta

  • ? commentary 2.9M
  • ? highres 7.6M
  • ? jpeg artifacts 27k

Information

  • ID: 2700423
  • Uploader: Klaudandus »
  • Date: about 9 years ago
  • Approver: phane »
  • Size: 358 KB .jpg (2000x2000) »
  • Source: x.com/coralus_SF/status/855817147280367617 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 111
  • Favorites: 189
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 42% of original (view original)
wendy (wendy's) drawn by coralus

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • She's beauty,
    she's grace,
    she's s a v a g e

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
    • « ‹ prev Pool: Current Events next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    [deleted]
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by Carachatodemais almost 6 years ago

    user 509825
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Looks on-topic to me.
    Has clearly traits of the manga style and if the source material has nothing to do with Anime, then it should be added to pool #1718.

    8 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Klaudandus
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    provence said:

    Looks on-topic to me.
    Has clearly traits of the manga style and if the source material has nothing to do with Anime, then it should be added to pool #1718.

    And it's not like this is the first pic of Wendy's in the board.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    m.usouka
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why was this even flagged?

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cd young
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    "not of sufficiently higher quality"

    Again like other "low quality pieces" that are actually staggeringly good, I wish I had this artist pathetic, low quality artistic talent.

    4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    underscoreCF
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    This post was flagged for review (learn more):

    "I do not like this painting, Danbooru. Its smug aura mocks me"

    10 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    laisy
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Borto said:

    lol they blocked us

    Oh that burn on Twitter was pretty savage.
    And TBH I don't know who's the 4th one either, so they have a point.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 509825
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    _cf said:

    "I do not like this painting, Danbooru. Its smug aura mocks me"

    Well, to be honest: That's more or less the crux of flagging, since I don't think that one flags an image one personally likes :P.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    TheGame7
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    laisy said:

    TBH I don't know who's the 4th one either, so they have a point.

    No they don't. Walking on the moon doesn't have quality to it. Serving overpriced roach infested burgers on the other hand does. And if you're going to go by "firsts" to determine quality, then white castle, McDonald's, burger king and jack in the box outcompete them by decades.

    Both of those places in the tweets are incredibly unprofessional and childish for allowing this kind of nonsense to represent them. I know I won't ever be going to either.

    -10 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Konekochan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Well at least ppl had some good lols

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Cliff Edge
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Alan Bean.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    79248cms
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    TheGame7 said:

    No they don't. Walking on the moon doesn't have quality to it. Serving overpriced roach infested burgers on the other hand does. And if you're going to go by "firsts" to determine quality, then white castle, McDonald's, burger king and jack in the box outcompete them by decades.

    Both of those places in the tweets are incredibly unprofessional and childish for allowing this kind of nonsense to represent them. I know I won't ever be going to either.

    It can't we worse than Pepsi's recent SJW campaign, which didn't even have humor in it and apparently offended some SJW too. The Wendy tweets were pretty good burns in response to somewhat ridiculous and libelous comments. I like it when companies fight back to defend their brand, it is something that isn't seen very often these days.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    JohnFreeman
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    And yet there are a ton of lower quality pics that could almost pass off as doodles that end up here. Sometimes I don't understand the double standards of these flaggers.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 509825
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    JohnFreeman said:

    And yet there are a ton of lower quality pics that could almost pass off as doodles that end up here. Sometimes I don't understand the double standards of these flaggers.

    Why double-standard? Flaggers are also only human and are missing out posts.
    Instead, it would be helpful if YOU could help out finding these "doodles" :P.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /