According to the flag and Provence argument, we should flag all chibi images as 'bad anatomy' too. As chibi is deformed small body with larger head and therefore shouldn't be possible?
Chibi =/= This Pic, Helepolis, is better to defend the image using the image or their style or similar cases. To me the flag is unnecesary for some reasons like this, because most of the artist improves a lot and tends to re draw some pics.
Also start to showing another artist and say: "Delete this too, because this reason then", just calm down, we are trying to keep the site with images and most of good works possible, is impossible to have art like the Louvre or be like an exclusive museum.
This image is not particularly made to be realistic. Of course, that doesn't mean that you can just draw people like some mutants, but I believe this one is good enough to not be deleted. Also, bad anatomy does not necessarily means that it must be deleted. As long as it's not so hideous.
I was pointing out the bad_anatomy which was also added to this picture, because Provence claims this is bad anatomy. My concern has nothing to do with style. The tag itself is misused here.
Well, well. The reason with chibi is pretty bad. Chibis don't want to portray a more realistic looking body. Chibi is most often meant to express something in a humorous way or to make something more cute. In this case it's not really chibi. The head fits to the torso and the proportions per se are correct. But such a neck (and maybe the arms, but they aren't the main problem here) that can fit into the the gap the legs are making in this pic, is way too slim.
Leave a comment