Nah, it's just because of her position and perspective. Everything is fine here.

Drewko said:

Nah, it's just because of her position and perspective. Everything is fine here.

Eh its a bit more then perspective her foot for instance is a mess, the broad back, small head. Flag is definitely warranted here

iori98 said:

Eh its a bit more then perspective her foot for instance is a mess, the broad back, small head. Flag is definitely warranted here

Didn't see the foot. Probably because I was weirded out by the other things when I tried uploading it, but then saw these flaws and said "Nope". But you're right.

Well, even this was flagged again: The attack against the artist is meh. They normally draw extremely good pictures.

The "smashed foot" issue is hilarious, because this is nothing new that ayakumo, despite having a "foot fetish", does not know how they works. But in the past none of his "smashed foots" were flagged...

Face? What's wrong with a face? It's normal for this artist, flagger messed up.

We just need to acknowledge the fact that artists have their quirks and flagging image for something that was accepted FROM THE SAME ARTIST in the past is ridiculous and undermine our whole quality system. Do we realy need to check all of his 127 pictures AGAIN right now?

Seems a majority of the images from this artist were uploaded by users that bypass the queue, so why not?

If the system were so flawless that "anything similar approved before is sacrosanct" then there wouldn't need to be an option to flag a post at all, eh?

In this case, the foot is really smashed. Compare it to the artist's other works. The foot does look good in them. Here....not.
Also, the perspective is the thing that got me away from this image when I was trying to upload it.

To the question: Why should we or not? Well, if we need to check every post, the Contributor status become pretty much...unneccssary. That's why only images get flagged (at least from me) that are looking really off.