Isn't yuri when the author himself tags it as Teitoku Love.
@Wilfriback No, from the yuri wiki: Any romantic or sexual interaction between female characters. It doesn't matter if it's mutual or one-sided. If it's mutual, consider adding the couple tag. -> The artist is irrelevant here^^. I go and add them back :3.
@Wilfriback No, from the yuri wiki: Any romantic or sexual interaction between female characters. It doesn't matter if it's mutual or one-sided. If it's mutual, consider adding the couple tag. -> The artist is irrelevant here^^. I go and add them back :3.
The pixiv tags are relevant however, there is several instance of posts using pixiv as reference to tag posts as yuri.
The intention it's clearly show the girls inviting the viewer(the admiral) into joining.
Well whatever, I made clear what it's said on the source.
@Wilfriback No, from the yuri wiki: Any romantic or sexual interaction between female characters. It doesn't matter if it's mutual or one-sided. If it's mutual, consider adding the couple tag. -> The artist is irrelevant here^^. I go and add them back :3.
Except it is relevant because context is relevant. This is dreadfully important in terms of stuff like traps, when Game CGs are posted, when PoV is included, etc because context is relevant when tagging something. This is terribly why 'Tag what you see' is horrid because it ignores context.
Someone just get a mod to make a decision either way or else this is just going to become a tag war.
Would you want this post to show up when searching for yuri? Is there some reason the picture should be excluded from yuri? I'm not talking descriptions and external tags here; the picture itself directly fits the description of yuri perfectly. Having not read the Pixiv tags or description myself, it's not clear that they're inviting somebody in. It looks like two girls looking back at something; there isn't even the shadow of a third person.
Would you want this post to show up when searching for yuri? Is there some reason the picture should be excluded from yuri? I'm not talking descriptions and external tags here; the picture itself directly fits the description of yuri perfectly. Having not read the Pixiv tags or description myself, it's not clear that they're inviting somebody in. It looks like two girls looking back at something; there isn't even the shadow of a third person.
But the author did give context on the Pixiv. Just because it 'fits the description' of a tag does not in itself give an excuse to tag it against what the source says. The biggest example of this is tagging traps as not just because it 'looks like the 1_girl' tag or even in the case that a Pixiv Artist actually draws a full fledged genderswap of said trap and states that its a genderswap on the Pixiv.
Heck. I argued the same thing for (NSFW warning) post #225322 , which had a child post (post #579058) tagged as rape simply because the context of the CG within the game wasn't considered.
Still, I'll defer to whatever. I'm more an advocate of accurate tagging more than anything.
Traps are tagged traps with artist context because they themselves are traps, and there is thus a trap in the image. This image can't be tagged with hetero because there's no male in it, and similarly should be tagged with yuri because it depicts only two women while those women are having a sexual interaction.
Fitting the description of a tag is really the only "excuse" to add a tag. It's their raison d'etre.
Commentary added for the translators to work with.
Point of order: the "Admiral LOVE" tag on the Pixiv post does not have the asterisk denoting an author-added tag - as far as I can tell, the only author-added tags are for Kancolle, Iowa, and Kongou. Also, Google translate of the commentary doesn't suggest the admiral being involved, though obviously I'll defer to anything an actual translator uncovers.
Traps are tagged traps with artist context because they themselves are traps, and there is thus a trap in the image. This image can't be tagged with hetero because there's no male in it, and similarly should be tagged with yuri because it depicts only two women while those women are having a sexual interaction.
Fitting the description of a tag is really the only "excuse" to add a tag. It's their raison d'etre.
But I wasn't arguing hetero or yuri. Just that context needs to be considered.
However, decision made and placed down. Should be the end of this.