How exactly do you reach that conclusion, Zaxxon? I'd agree that an interest in *2D* lolicon doesn't make you a pedo, but loli in general doesn't seem so ambiguous to me.
I'm not trying to toss around accusations of pedophilia or anything, I'm just curious as to Zaxxon's reasoning. I'll admit to having a few loli characters that I'm... *ahem*... overly fond of myself, but my interest cuts out when the participants stop being fictional. Is this the distinction you're making?
Interestingly, we (thankfully) aren't Japanese. "Loli" and "Lolicon" are to be considered loanwords at this point-- their connoted meaning is accepted as being and being a fan of two-dimensional drawn works depicting girls of younger appearance respectively. As there is no denotative enumeration, the common parlance is regarded with even more force than usual.
Leave a comment