^
Completely agree.
Posted under General
Is this loli?
Danaii said:
Is this loli?
Nope, it's not even rating:q
kittey said:
Obviously mis-tagged with shota. The three characters seem to be girls and it’s a safe rating anyway. We don’t tag loli or shota on safe posts.
Actually, how did you find that post as a member-level user?
Speaking of that:
rating:s shota order:score
One might look over this and remove the tag or change the rating to q if necessary.
The search query with loli returns no post.
Cleaned up the query a bit.
Unsure about post #2683875 and post #2475789, though.
Provence said:
The search query with loli returns no post.
I sometimes clean that up.
Unsure about post #2683875 and post #2475789, though.
Dunno about the first one, but the second one is sufficiently obscured non-sexual nudity, so safe and no shota.
Not sure if this needs to keep the loli tag as there is nothing sexual occuring...yet, though those sneaking tentacles imply what is soon to happen. Nor is there any nudity, the girl is wearing a one piece swimsuit though it does look pretty tight fitting.
Monki said:
Not sure if this needs to keep the loli tag as there is nothing sexual occuring...yet, though those sneaking tentacles imply what is soon to happen. Nor is there any nudity, the girl is wearing a one piece swimsuit though it does look pretty tight fitting.
Cameltoe and incoming tentacles in combination with her blushing (more than in the more clothed parent post): I’d say loli.
The other images in the set I felt were loli, but these two the proportions look fairly un-loli, but just posting here to be safe.
Children in bikinis that leave little to the imagination still count as loli, right?
iridescent_slime said:
Children in bikinis that leave little to the imagination still count as loli, right?
I agree.
post #2748021
Tending towards loli.
Unsure about this.
Not sure if this should keep the loli tag. Can't tell if those are frilly panties or shorty shorts.